Citation network
Nebbia Vs. New York
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 05, 1934
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Nebbia v. NewSearch
-
York - 291 U.S. 502 (1934) U.S. Supreme Court Nebbia v. NewSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
York, 291 U.S. 502 (1934) Nebbia v. NewSearch
-
to businesses which are public utilities, or which have a monopoly or enjoy a public grant or franchise. Munn v. IllinoisSearch
-
possesses the power to control the prices to be charged for fluid milk. Compare American Sugar Refining Co. v. LouisianaSearch
-
price, the state is incapable of directly controlling the price itself. This view was negatived many years ago. Munn v. IllinoisSearch
-
in any business, its practices and charges, clearly is not the enjoyment of any franchise from the state, Munn v. IllinoisSearch
-
for in Brass v. PageSearch
-
operated, and that the business was keenly competitive throughout the state. In German Alliance Insurance Co. v. LewisSearch
-
no business more essentially private in character can be imagined than that of loaning one's personal funds. Griffith v. ConnecticutSearch
-
are private, because the business of insurance is considered one properly subject to public control. O'Gorman & Young v. HartfordSearch
-
one of personal and private nature, Page 291 U. S. 536 are not a deprivation of due process. Frisbie v. UnitedSearch
-
Margolin v. UnitedSearch
-
and its charges may be controlled. Cotting v. KansasSearch
-
corresponding services, if the state, in pursuance of a public policy to protect the latter, so determines. Stephenson v. BinfordSearch
-
as a reasonable exertion of governmental authority or condemn it as arbitrary or discriminatory. Wolff Packing Co. v. IndustrialSearch
-
Northern Securities Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
People v. NebbiaSearch
-
Many of these regulations have been unsuccessfully challenged on constitutional grounds. See People v. CipperlySearch
-
People v. HillSearch
-
People v. WestSearch
-
People v. KiblerSearch
-
People v. HillsSearch
-
People v. BowenSearch
-
Lieberman v. VanSearch
-
St. John v. NewSearch
-
People v. KosterSearch
-
People v. AbramsonSearch
-
People v. FrudenbergSearch
-
People v. BeakesSearch
-
People v. TeuscherSearch
-
People v. PerrettaSearch
-
People v. RyanSearch
-
Atlantic Coast Line v. RiversideSearch
-
Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. v. McGuireSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Nebbia v. NewSearch
-
Compare American Sugar Refining Co. v. LouisianaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial