Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Best Vs. District of Columbia

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 05, 1934

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

32 entries 2 linked 30 unlinked
Show
  1. Gunning Vs. Cooley US Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1930
  2. Union Pacific Ry. Co. Vs. Mcdonald US Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1894
    Distinguished
  3. Best v. District
    Search
  4. of Columbia - 291 U.S. 411 (1934) U.S. Supreme Court Best v. District
    Search
  5. of Columbia, 291 U.S. 411 (1934) Best v. District
    Search
  6. the flooring in repair so that children will not be exposed to the danger of falling through holes. Railroad Co. v. Stout
    Search
  7. Union Pacific Ry. v. McDonald
    Search
  8. U. S. 262 , applied. United Zinc Co. v. Britt
    Search
  9. of the court to act upon facts conceded by counsel is as plain as its power to act upon evidence produced. Oscanyan v. Arms
    Search
  10. not objectionable, but is convenient in saving time and expense by shortening trials. Liverpool, N.Y. & P. SS. Co. v. Commissioners
    Search
  11. from them, the question is not one of law, but of fact to be settled by the jury. Richmond & Danville R. Co. v. Powers
    Search
  12. Texas & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Harvey
    Search
  13. in plaintiff's favor, that Page 291 U. S. 416 no cause of action exists. See Illinois Power & Light Corp. v. Hurley
    Search
  14. Stuthman v. United
    Search
  15. decisions of this Court bearing upon the liability of the District warranted that course. The case of United Zinc Co. v. Britt
    Search
  16. The decision did not overrule Railroad Co. v. Stout
    Search
  17. Wall. 657, or Union Pacific Ry. Co. v. McDonald
    Search
  18. The Court added that, in the very similar case of Cooke v. Midland
    Search
  19. In New York, N.H. & H. R. Co. v. Fruchter
    Search
  20. him to climb to a point from which he could touch the bare wire thirty feet above the street. The cases of Erie R. Co. v. Hilt
    Search
  21. U. S. 97 , and Erie R. Co. v. Duplak
    Search
  22. U.S. Supreme Court Best v. District
    Search
  23. Railroad Co. v. Stout
    Search
  24. United Zinc Co. v. Britt
    Search
  25. Oscanyan v. Arms
    Search
  26. Liverpool, N.Y. & P. SS. Co. v. Commissioners
    Search
  27. Richmond & Danville R. Co. v. Powers
    Search
  28. See Illinois Power & Light Corp. v. Hurley
    Search
  29. of United Zinc Co. v. Britt
    Search
  30. of Cooke v. Midland
    Search
  31. of Erie R. Co. v. Hilt
    Search
  32. and Erie R. Co. v. Duplak
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial