Citation network
Burns Mortgage Co. Vs. Fried
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 28, 1934
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 487 (1934) U.S. Supreme Court Burns Mortgage Co. v. FriedSearch
-
U.S. 487 (1934) Burns Mortgage Co. v. FriedSearch
-
a statute prescribing rules of commercial law and one concerned with some other subject of narrower scope. Swift v. TysonSearch
-
other subject of narrower scope. The contention of the respondent that this Court announced a contrary view in Swift v. TysonSearch
-
We are referred to certain expressions found in Watson v. TarpleySearch
-
by which the negotiable character of the notes is to be determined. 3. The petitioner asserts that, in Taylor v. AmericanSearch
-
call for the payment of a sum certain, and must therefore be held not to be negotiable. First National Bank of Miami v. BoslerSearch
-
could not ascertain at which rate interest was payable on overdue principal. The decision has been criticized, Lessen v. LindseySearch
-
Rankin v. WoodworthSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Hanratty v. DoughertySearch
-
Fahnestock v. SchoyerSearch
-
Reynolds v. RichardsSearch
-
Kobey v. HoffmanSearch
-
Bank of United States v. TylerSearch
-
Paine v. CentralSearch
-
Sowell v. FederalSearch
-
Crittenden v. WidrevitzSearch
-
Mack v. DaileySearch
-
Queensboro Nat. Bank v. KellySearch
-
Junction R. Co. v. BankSearch
-
Prentice v. ZaneSearch
-
Phipps v. HardingSearch
-
United Divers Supply Co. v. CommercialSearch
-
Gutelius v. StanbonSearch
-
Knights of Pythias v. MeyerSearch
-
Jones v. PrairieSearch
-
Gregg Dyeing Co. v. QuerySearch
-
Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. LaneSearch
-
Bank v. SwiftSearch
-
Peterson v. MetropolitanSearch
-
Jockmus v. ClaussenSearch
-
Byrne v. KansasSearch
-
Babbitt v. ReadSearch
-
Manufacturers' Finance Corp. v. Vye-NeillSearch
-
Co., 62 F.2d 625, 628. Compare American Mfg. Co. v. U.SSearch
-
The court cited Savings Bank of Richmond v. NationalSearch
-
Bank of Goldboro, 3 F.2d 970, and Niagara Fire Ins. Co. v. RaleighSearch
-
courts have held they must follow the state court's construction of the Uniform Negotiable Instruments Law. See Kobey v. HoffmanSearch
-
Queensboro National Bank v. KellySearch
-
F.2d 574. Compare Bank of United States v. CuthbertsonSearch
-
Farmers' National Bank v. SuttonSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Burns Mortgage Co. v. FriedSearch
-
Taylor v. AmericanSearch
-
First National Bank of Miami v. BoslerSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial