Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Burnet Vs. Brooks

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 13, 1933

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

66 entries 10 linked 56 unlinked
Show
  1. Nichols Vs. Coolidge US Supreme Court · May 31, 1927
  2. Heiner Vs. Donnan US Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1932
  3. United States Vs. Doremus US Supreme Court · Mar 03, 1919
  4. BaldwIn Vs. Missouri US Supreme Court · May 26, 1930
  5. First National Bank of Boston Vs. Maine US Supreme Court · Jan 04, 1932
  6. Eidman Vs. Martinez US Supreme Court · Mar 17, 1902
  7. Brewster Vs. Gage US Supreme Court · Jan 06, 1930
  8. Mackenzie Vs. Hare US Supreme Court · Dec 06, 1915
  9. Union Refrigerator Transit Co. Vs. Kentucky US Supreme Court · Nov 13, 1905
    Relied / Followed
  10. Cook Vs. Tait US Supreme Court · May 05, 1924
    Relied / Followed
  11. U.S. 378 (1933) U.S. Supreme Court Burnet v. Brooks
    Search
  12. U.S. 378 (1933) Burnet v. Brooks
    Search
  13. had it been imposed in apt terms, in the view that the property was intangible, and belonged to a nonresident. Eidman v. Martinez
    Search
  14. And, before the Revenue Act of 1921 was passed, we had stated the principles deemed controlling in De Ganay v. Lederer
    Search
  15. impose the tax with respect to bonds physically within the United States and stock in domestic corporations. Brewster v. Gage
    Search
  16. and not certificates of stock, if these were physically in the United States at the time of death. See De Ganay v. Lederer
    Search
  17. corporation in all cases, whether the certificates were physically present in the United States or not. Compare Corry v. Baltimore
    Search
  18. with all the powers of government necessary to maintain an effective control of international relations. Fong Yue Ting v. United
    Search
  19. Knox v. Lee
    Search
  20. we said in Mackenzie v. Hare
    Search
  21. is a postulate of legislative action in other countries. The subject was considered by the House of Lords in Winans v. Attorney
    Search
  22. In Disconto-Gesellschaft v. United
    Search
  23. the title. An execution locally valid is as effectual as an ordinary purchase. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley R. Co. v. Clarksdale
    Search
  24. protection of life, liberty, and property of all persons, citizens and friendly aliens alike. Russian Volunteer Fleet v. United
    Search
  25. the federal government had jurisdiction to impose the tax, there is manifestly no ground for assailing it. Knowlton v. Moore
    Search
  26. McCray v. United
    Search
  27. Flint v. Stone
    Search
  28. Brushaber v. Union
    Search
  29. states under the due process Page 288 U. S. 401 clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. Minnesota
    Search
  30. Beidler v. South
    Search
  31. be taxed in only one state, and that jurisdiction to tax was restricted accordingly. In Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Minnesota
    Search
  32. from the decisions in respect of various and distinct kinds of property, that the Court applied in First National Bank v. Maine
    Search
  33. the principle has had a progressive application. Page 288 U. S. 402 In Louisville & Jeffersonville Ferry Co. v. Kentucky
    Search
  34. Fourteenth Amendment precluded the imposition. Id., p. 188 U. S. 398 . In Union Refrigerator Transit Co. v. Kentucky
    Search
  35. to subject it to state taxation rested exclusively in that state, regardless of the domicile of the owner. By Frick v. Pennsylvania
    Search
  36. an actual situs, and could not be exercised by another state where the decedent was domiciled. See First National Bank v. Maine
    Search
  37. supra, p. 284 U. S. 322 . The decision in Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Minnesota
    Search
  38. supra, overruling Blackstone v. Miller
    Search
  39. restrict the taxing power of the federal government. The distinction was clearly and definitely made in United States v. Bennett
    Search
  40. jurisdiction to tax personal property which had a permanent situs in another state. Union Refrigerator Transit Co. v. Kentucky
    Search
  41. of state jurisdiction to tax and the broad authority of the federal government was restated and applied in Cook v. Tait
    Search
  42. U. S. 47 , 265 U. S. 55 -56, and was again explicitly recognized in Frick v. Pennsylvania
    Search
  43. The case of Blackstone v. Miller
    Search
  44. U. S. 189 , was not overruled until 1930. See Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. Minnesota
    Search
  45. U.S. Supreme Court Burnet v. Brooks
    Search
  46. De Ganay v. Lederer
    Search
  47. See De Ganay v. Lederer
    Search
  48. Compare Corry v. Baltimore
    Search
  49. Fong Yue Ting v. United
    Search
  50. Winans v. Attorney
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial