Citation network
Buffum Vs. Peter Barceloux Co.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 10, 1933
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Buffum v. PeterSearch
-
Barceloux Co. - 289 U.S. 227 (1933) U.S. Supreme Court Buffum v. PeterSearch
-
Barceloux Co., 289 U.S. 227 (1933) Buffum v. PeterSearch
-
e), and recovery will be for the benefit of all the creditors. Moore v. BaySearch
-
e). Moore v. BaySearch
-
The pledge was a step in a general plan which must be viewed as a whole with all its composite implications. Dean v. DavisSearch
-
a party to a plan to appropriate a surplus and in combination with its debtor to hold his creditors at bay. Dean v. DavisSearch
-
many other creditors whose claims are still unpaid. What the trustee recovers will be for the benefit of all. Moore v. BaySearch
-
subject to a specific lien may be estopped while he retains the benefit from disavowing the attendant burden. Freeman v. AuldSearch
-
for an estoppel is cut away if the transaction is lawfully disaffirmed and the security abandoned. Old National Bank v. HeckmanSearch
-
Ind. 490, 507, 47 N.E. 953. Cf. Bybee v. OregonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
suing in such circumstances for an accounting in equity, would have had the shares, and not the value. See Dunphy v. KleinschmidtSearch
-
Wasey v. HolbrookSearch
-
of the pledge. There was no objection at any stage of the controversy that the case was triable by a jury. Schoenthal v. IrvingSearch
-
United States v. BitterSearch
-
contingencies. The point will not be labored, for, at the trial, the defendant did not argue to the contrary ( Reynes v. DumontSearch
-
American Mills Co. v. AmericanSearch
-
Schoenthal v. IrvingSearch
-
for the value of the shares which it had fraudulently acquired and then conveyed to someone else. United States v. DunnSearch
-
Independent Coal & Coke Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Newton v. PorterSearch
-
Hamilton National Bank v. HalstedSearch
-
could change its liability by buying back the shares. The answer is supplied by the opinion of Story, J., in Oliver v. PiattSearch
-
the subject matter of a trust becomes accountable at once for the proceeds or the value. Cf. Hamilton National Bank v. HalstedSearch
-
Bunnel v. StoddardSearch
-
Miles v. CoombsSearch
-
Burwell v. Burwell'sSearch
-
Bate v. ScalesSearch
-
The standard of duty is no different whether the trust to be enforced is actual or constructive. United States v. DunnSearch
-
has its distinctive standards of fidelity and honor, higher at times than the standards of the market place. Meinhard v. SalmonSearch
-
decree of the District Court is erroneous insofar as the claim of the defendant is postponed to those of others. Moore v. BaySearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Buffum v. PeterSearch
-
Moore v. BaySearch
-
Dean v. DavisSearch
-
Freeman v. AuldSearch
-
Old National Bank v. HeckmanSearch
-
Cf. Bybee v. OregonSearch
-
See Dunphy v. KleinschmidtSearch
-
Cf. Hamilton National Bank v. HalstedSearch
-
Bunnel v. StoddardSearch
-
Meinhard v. SalmonSearch
-
United States v. DunnSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial