Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Jaffar @ Raju Vs. State

Cites for this judgment

  • Delhi High Court
  • May 08, 2013

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

68 entries 8 linked 60 unlinked
Show
  1. Sherimon Vs. State of Kerala Supreme Court of India · Nov 14, 2011
  2. S.Arul Raja Vs. State of T.Nadu Supreme Court of India · Jul 30, 2010
  3. Jayabalan Vs. U.T. of Pondicherry Supreme Court of India · Nov 06, 2009
    Relied / Followed
  4. Guddu Vs. State Delhi · Apr 23, 2010
  5. (2003) 5 SCC 29
    Search
  6. (2007) 13 SCC 90
    Search
  7. 1974 (3) SCC 69
    Search
  8. Appellant Mr. S.B. Dandapani, Advocate along with the appellant (in custody) v. STATE
    Search
  9. Appellant Mr. K.M.Khan, Advocate along with the appellant (in custody) v. STATE
    Search
  10. Surinder Pal Jain v. Delhi
    Search
  11. Harichand Kurmi v. State
    Search
  12. Mookkoiah & Anr. v. State
    Search
  13. Karamjit Singh v. State
    Search
  14. C.Ronald and Another v. Union
    Search
  15. Ronald James Alwaris Etc. v. State
    Search
  16. State of Uttar Pradesh v. Krishna
    Search
  17. Munish Muban v. State
    Search
  18. In Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v. State
    Search
  19. In Padala Veera Reddy v. State
    Search
  20. In Balwinder Singh v. State
    Search
  21. In Harishchandra Ladaku Thange v. State
    Search
  22. In State of U.P. v. Ashok
    Search
  23. In Ram Singh v. Sonia
    Search
  24. In Ujagar Singh v. State
    Search
  25. adopt a careful approach and analyse evidence to find out whether it is cogent and credible.32. In Dalip Singh and others v. The
    Search
  26. be limited to and be governed by its own facts.33. The above decision has since been followed in Guli Chand and others v. State
    Search
  27. Vadivelu Thevar v. State
    Search
  28. Rameshwar v. State
    Search
  29. still persists, if not in the judgements of the Courts, at any rate in the arguments of counsel.35. In Masalti and others v. State
    Search
  30. Ram Bharosey v. State
    Search
  31. interested witnesses cannot be relied upon by the Court.38. Substantially similar view was taken in Dharnidhar and others v. State
    Search
  32. Kasmira Singh v. State
    Search
  33. Bhuboni Sahu v. The
    Search
  34. Pulukuri Kottaya and Ors. v. Emperor
    Search
  35. Narender, Usha, Satish and Navin v. State
    Search
  36. Ramesh v. State
    Search
  37. Sh. v. Shankar
    Search
  38. 2009 Cri LJ 361
    Search
  39. Sherimon v. State
    Search
  40. Surinder Pal Jain v. Delhi
    Search
  41. Harichand Kurmi v. State
    Search
  42. Mookkoiah & Anr. v. State
    Search
  43. Karamjit Singh v. State
    Search
  44. C.Ronald and Another v. Union
    Search
  45. Munish Muban v. State
    Search
  46. In Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v. State
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial