Citation network
Williams Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 29, 1933
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Williams v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 289 U.S. 553 (1933) U.S. Supreme Court Williams v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 289 U.S. 553 (1933) Williams v. UnitedSearch
-
tenure of office and compensation. Ex parte Bakelite Corp., 279 U. S. 438 . Expressions in United States v. KleinSearch
-
Expressions in Minnesota v. HitchcockSearch
-
U. S. 373 , and Kansas v. UnitedSearch
-
framed, the proposition that Art. III intended to include suits against the United States is inadmissible. Chisholm v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Dall. 419, and Hans v. LouisianaSearch
-
American Ins. Co. v. CanterSearch
-
of testing the constitutionality of a reduction of his official salary. Cf. the preceding report of O'Donoghue v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
per annum under a ruling of the Comptroller General of the United States. Compare O'Donoghue v. UnitedSearch
-
Because of that provision, it was held in Gordon v. UnitedSearch
-
Congress may authorize an appeal to this Court from a final judgment or decree of the Court of Claims, United States v. JonesSearch
-
Luckenbach S.S. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
the judgment of this Court rendered on such appeal constitutes a final determination of the matter. United States v. O'GradySearch
-
upon constitutional courts, is plainly apparent from the opinion of Chief Justice Marshall in American Insurance Co. v. CanterSearch
-
during this long period of time, and their authority to do so must be regarded as conclusively established. Levin v. UnitedSearch
-
in several cases has expressed, more or less irrelevantly, its opinion in the affirmative. Thus, in United States v. KleinSearch
-
that such court was thus constituted one of those inferior courts which Congress authorizes. In United States v. UnionSearch
-
Claims, and vested each of them with a defined portion of the judicial power found in the Constitution. In Minnesota v. HitchcockSearch
-
Kansas v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. LouisianaSearch
-
and the expressions referred to were clearly obiter dicta, which, as said by Chief Justice Marshall in Cohens v. VirginiaSearch
-
dispenses with trial by jury, a provision which was distinctly upheld in spite of the Seventh Amendment in McElrath v. UnitedSearch
-
In Gordon v. UnitedSearch
-
on that basis, distinctly recognized that Congress may require it to give advisory decisions. And, in United States v. KleinSearch
-
In the present case, the court below regarded the recent decision in Miles v. GrahamSearch
-
cited and holding that the Court of Claims is a constitutional, rather than a legislative, court. But, in this, Miles v. GrahamSearch
-
taken in this case as disturbing the earlier rulings or attributing to the Court of Claims a changed status. Webster v. FallSearch
-
That court was said to be a constitutional court in United States v. UnionSearch
-
Page 289 U. S. 572 In Minnesota v. HitchcockSearch
-
cases, and its omission in others, cannot be regarded as accidental under the rule stated in an early case, Holmes v. JennisonSearch
-
Myers v. UnitedSearch
-
in some instances and its omission in others is commented upon by Mr. Justice Story in Martin v. Hunter'sSearch
-
U. S. 574 such, of great value in expounding the meaning of the judicial article of that instrument. Martin v. Hunter'sSearch
-
Borrs v. PrestonSearch
-
Wisconsin v. PelicanSearch
-
And in Cohens v. VirginiaSearch
-
as to whether this authorized a suit against a state by a citizen of another state was considered in Chisholm v. GeorgiaSearch
-
by a citizen of that state to recover the amount of certain unpaid coupons annexed to an issue of state bonds. Hans v. LouisianaSearch
-
could not be sued without its consent. The case then came to this Court on error, and the judgment was affirmed. Hans v. LouisianaSearch
-
foreign state. But, it said, such a result would be no less startling and unexpected than was the decision in Chisholm v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Mr. Justice Iredell, which was characterized as able, was distinctly approved. As opposed to the decision in Chisholm v. GeorgiaSearch
-
clearly right, and that the views expressed by them applied as well to the then pending case as to that of Chisholm v. GeorgiaSearch
-
a state and those brought against the United States. The doctrine of sovereign immunity is fully discussed in Hans v. LouisianaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial