Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Burnet Vs. Chicago Portrait Co.

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Feb 23, 1932

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

30 entries 8 linked 22 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Healey US Supreme Court · Dec 02, 1895
  2. Wayman Vs. Southard US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1825
  3. Marriott Vs. Brune US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1850
  4. American Tobacco Co. Vs. Werckmeister US Supreme Court · Dec 02, 1907
  5. United States Vs. Louisville US Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1898
  6. Stairs Vs. Peaslee US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1855
  7. Pearcy Vs. Stranahan US Supreme Court · Apr 08, 1907
  8. United States Vs. Dickson US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1841
  9. Burnet v. Chicago
    Search
  10. Portrait Co. - 285 U.S. 1 (1932) U.S. Supreme Court Burnet v. Chicago
    Search
  11. Portrait Co., 285 U.S. 1 (1932) Burnet v. Chicago
    Search
  12. In the case of tariff acts, this Court said in Stairs v. Peaslee
    Search
  13. United States v. The
    Search
  14. Campbell v. Barney
    Search
  15. under the tariff laws. De Lima v. Bidwell
    Search
  16. in the Commercial Convention with Cuba of 1903 (33 Stat. 2136, 2140) did not include the Philippine Islands. Faber v. United
    Search
  17. within the meaning of the Tariff Act of 1897 (30 Stat. 151). Pearcy v. Stranahan
    Search
  18. Mesevich v. Tod
    Search
  19. consistently given to a statute by the executive department charged with its administration. United States v. Jackson
    Search
  20. and consistent, it will be taken into account only to the extent that it is supported by valid reasons. United States v. Missouri
    Search
  21. Pacific R. Co., 278 U. S. 269 , 278 U. S. 280 . See also United States v. Dickson
    Search
  22. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co. v. McCaull-Dinsmore
    Search
  23. Inter-Island Steam Navigation Co. v. Ward
    Search
  24. Porto Rico Railway, Light & Power Co. v. Mor
    Search
  25. U.S. Supreme Court Burnet v. Chicago
    Search
  26. United States v. The
    Search
  27. De Lima v. Bidwell
    Search
  28. the Philippine Islands. Faber v. United
    Search
  29. United States v. Jackson
    Search
  30. United States v. Missouri
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial