Citation network
Lamb Vs. Schmitt
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 14, 1932
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 222 (1932) U.S. Supreme Court Lamb v. SchmittSearch
-
U.S. 222 (1932) Lamb v. SchmittSearch
-
for Northern Mississippi which quashed service of process upon the petitioner, Lamb. The suit is a companion to Lamb v. CramerSearch
-
of process in another is founded not upon the convenience of the individuals, but of the court itself. Page Co. v. MacdonaldSearch
-
Hale v. WhartonSearch
-
Diamond v. EarleSearch
-
Parker v. MarcoSearch
-
those whose presence is necessary or convenient to the judicial administration in the pending litigation. See Bridges v. SheldonSearch
-
F. 17, 43 et seq. In Stewart v. RamsaySearch
-
the Court said at p. 242 U. S. 130 , quoting from Parker v. HotchkissSearch
-
upon which it is founded, and that it should be extended or withheld only as judicial necessities require. See Brooks v. StateSearch
-
Netograph Co. v. ScrughamSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Nichols v. HortonSearch
-
Iron Dyke Copper Min. Co. v. IronSearch
-
personal interests of those concerned, was not for the purpose of facilitating the progress of the cause, see Brooks v. StateSearch
-
Vaughn v. BoydSearch
-
Sampson v. GravesSearch
-
attendance was not voluntary, and hence had no tendency to interfere with judicial administration, Netograph Mfg. Co. v. ScrughamSearch
-
to compel restoration of the subject matter of the suit wrongfully removed from the custody of the court. See Lamb v. CramerSearch
-
even though the service was made in an independent suit in no sense ancillary to the pending litigation. See Livengood v. BallSearch
-
Rizo v. BurruelSearch
-
but for the acts charged against the petitioner in the second, would have been secured in the first. Cf. Page Co. v. MacdonaldSearch
-
citizenship of the parties or the satisfaction of any other jurisdictional requirements. Pacific Railroad of Missouri v. MissouriSearch
-
the allegations in the bill of complaint, and that the truth or falsity of the pleadings cannot be assumed. See Page v. MacdonaldSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Lamb v. SchmittSearch
-
See Bridges v. SheldonSearch
-
In Stewart v. RamsaySearch
-
Parker v. HotchkissSearch
-
See Brooks v. StateSearch
-
Brooks v. StateSearch
-
Netograph Mfg. Co. v. ScrughamSearch
-
See Lamb v. CramerSearch
-
See Livengood v. BallSearch
-
Cf. Page Co. v. MacdonaldSearch
-
Pacific Railroad of Missouri v. MissouriSearch
-
See Page v. MacdonaldSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial