Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Michigan Vs. Michigan Trust Co.

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 16, 1932

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

41 entries 4 linked 37 unlinked
Show
  1. New York Vs. Jersawit US Supreme Court · Jan 07, 1924
  2. United States Vs. Wong US Supreme Court · May 23, 1977
  3. Poe Vs. Seaborn US Supreme Court · Nov 24, 1930
  4. HarkIn Vs. Brundage US Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1928
  5. Michigan v. Michigan
    Search
  6. Trust Co. - 286 U.S. 334 (1932) U.S. Supreme Court Michigan v. Michigan
    Search
  7. Trust Co., 286 U.S. 334 (1932) Michigan v. Michigan
    Search
  8. should be watched with a jealous eye to avoid inequitable results. P. 286 U. S. 345 . 3. United States v. Whitridge
    Search
  9. in aid of the dissolution of the corporation or the liquidation of its business. See, e.g., Collector of Taxes v. Railway
    Search
  10. Ohio v. Harris
    Search
  11. Page 286 U. S. 342 See, e.g., Cobbs & Mitchell v. Tax
    Search
  12. importing the doing of business in the usual course by agents and officers appointed in the usual way. United States v. Whitridge
    Search
  13. has been thought by other courts to include the operations of a business conducted by receivers. Central Trust Co. v. N.Y
    Search
  14. New York Terminal Co. v. Gaus
    Search
  15. Armstrong v. Emmerson
    Search
  16. People v. Hopkins
    Search
  17. for which a tax was due. Cf. Central Trust Co. v. N.Y
    Search
  18. Collector of Taxes v. Bay
    Search
  19. a background of common law doctrine, giving meaning and perspective to a vague and imperfect outline. Ward v. Erie
    Search
  20. Murray v. Chicago
    Search
  21. Rice v. Minn
    Search
  22. Mason v. United
    Search
  23. Quong Ham Wah Co. v. Industrial
    Search
  24. of a receivership or subsequently accruing, are the price that business has to pay for protection and security. Coy v. Title
    Search
  25. Turner v. Western
    Search
  26. that duty then, it should be compelled to pay them now. The decisions as to this are persuasive and uniform. Coy v. Title
    Search
  27. Bright v. Arkansas
    Search
  28. McFarland v. Hurley
    Search
  29. of administration in bankruptcy and enabling a tottering business to continue while creditors are held at bay. Harkin v. Brundage
    Search
  30. Kingsport Press v. Brief
    Search
  31. be an injustice to the state and a reproach to equity. A word in conclusion should be said as to United States v. Whitridge
    Search
  32. U.S. Supreme Court Michigan v. Michigan
    Search
  33. Collector of Taxes v. Railway
    Search
  34. Cobbs & Mitchell v. Tax
    Search
  35. Central Trust Co. v. N.Y
    Search
  36. Cf. Central Trust Co. v. N.Y
    Search
  37. Ward v. Erie
    Search
  38. Coy v. Title
    Search
  39. Turner v. Western
    Search
  40. Kingsport Press v. Brief
    Search
  41. United States v. Whitridge
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial