Citation network
Reed Vs. Allen
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 16, 1932
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 191 (1932) U.S. Supreme Court Reed v. AllenSearch
-
U.S. 191 (1932) Reed v. AllenSearch
-
to appeal the first ejectment as well as the interpleader, and advise the appellate court of their relation. Butler v. EatonSearch
-
suit as having conclusively established the construction of these provisions in their favor. See Lessee of Parrish v. FerrisSearch
-
action required payment to one party or the other of the money surrendered by the stakeholder. Compare United States v. MoserSearch
-
had appealed from the judgment, the appellate court, having both cases before it, might have afforded a remedy. Butler v. EatonSearch
-
is of his own making, the result of an utter failure to follow the course which the decision of this Court in Butler v. EatonSearch
-
would be greater than the benefit which would result from relieving some case of individual hardship. United States v. ThrockmortonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
second judgment will stand as res judicata although the first judgment be subsequently reversed. Deposit Bank v. FrankfortSearch
-
Parkhurst v. BerdellSearch
-
Gould v. SternbergSearch
-
is equally effective as an estoppel upon the points decided, whether the decision be right or wrong. Cornett v. WilliamsSearch
-
Wilson v. DeenSearch
-
Chicago, R.I. & P. Ry. Co. v. SchendelSearch
-
United States Bank v. BankSearch
-
Haebler v. MyersSearch
-
ascertained through an order to show cause known as a scire facias quare restitutionem habere non debet. Haebler v. MyersSearch
-
Sympson v. JuxonSearch
-
He may elect to maintain an action, or the court in its discretion may remit him to that remedy. United States Bank v. BankSearch
-
Clark v. PinneySearch
-
Stevens v. FitchSearch
-
A question very similar was considered by the courts of New York in the early case of Clark v. PinneySearch
-
Page 286 U. S. 205 Cow. 297 (cited by this Court in United States Bank v. BankSearch
-
the trial, as we are privileged to do, in order to ascertain the grounds upon which possession was awarded ( Oklahoma v. TexasSearch
-
National Foundry & Pipe Works v. OcontoSearch
-
but not that it was his only one, or that the failure to pursue it brought down upon his head a penalty so dire. Clark v. PinneySearch
-
had brought up the review of the judgment before there had been opportunity to pass upon the decree. Parkhurst v. BerdellSearch
-
analogous to those that govern the allowance or denial of a writ of restitution. The subject was considered in Butler v. EatonSearch
-
of review and motions for a new trial and all the technical apparatus familiar to students of procedure. Cf. Ballard v. SearlsSearch
-
Walz v. AgriculturalSearch
-
remedies so summary where the decree of reversal has been rendered in the courts of another jurisdiction. Deposit Bank v. FrankfortSearch
-
of a state to give effect and credit to the judgments of the federal courts and those of other states. Deposit Bank v. FrankfortSearch
-
product of the first, and hence within the equity and reason of the writ of restitution. What was written in Butler v. EatonSearch
-
The respondent is in a worse plight than was the plaintiff in error in Butler v. EatonSearch
-
for the time to move for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence expired with the term. United States v. MayerSearch
-
common law when the remedy was held to be one affecting possession only, and not directed to the title. Cincinnati v. WhiteSearch
-
Bank of United States v. BankSearch
-
not so few and narrow. A little of the liberality of method that has shaped the law of restitution in the past ( Clark v. PinneySearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Reed v. AllenSearch
-
See Lessee of Parrish v. FerrisSearch
-
Compare United States v. MoserSearch
-
Gould v. SternbergSearch
-
Cornett v. WilliamsSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial