Citation network
Adams Vs. Mills
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 23, 1932
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 397 (1932) U.S. Supreme Court Adams v. MillsSearch
-
U.S. 397 (1932) Adams v. MillsSearch
-
Adams v. MellonSearch
-
to the plaintiffs, who, as consignees, had paid the charge found unlawful. See Chicago Live Stock Exchange v. AtchisonSearch
-
the balance remaining. We think the argument unsound for the reasons, among others, stated in Southern Pacific Co. v. Darnell-TaenzerSearch
-
Nashville R. Co. v. PageSearch
-
Steel & Iron Co., 269 U. S. 217 , 269 U. S. 234 -238. See also Missouri Portland Cement Co. v. DirectorSearch
-
Doughty-McDonald Grocery Co. v. AtchisonSearch
-
California Fruit Exchange v. AmericanSearch
-
if the merchandise had been delivered without payment of the full amount lawfully due. New York Central & H.R. Co. v. YorkSearch
-
Whitney Co., 256 U. S. 406 , 256 U. S. 407 -408. Compare Union Pac. R. Co. v. AmericanSearch
-
In contemplation of law the claim for damages arose at the time the extra charge was paid. See Southern Pacific Co. v. Darnell-TaenzerSearch
-
and the consignees, and the carriers cannot be allowed to import one into it. Compare Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Sloss-SheffieldSearch
-
of the shippers in the proceeds of the action will not be affected by our decision. Compare Jennison Bros. & Co. v. DixonSearch
-
Texas Livestock Shippers Protective League v. DirectorSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
of the Interstate Commerce Act is not to be so construed. Compare Spiller v. AtchisonSearch
-
was not a pure question of law to be determined by merely reading the tariffs. Compare Great Northern Ry. Co. v. Merchants'Search
-
charge from the shippers was an unreasonable and unlawful practice must be sustained. Atchison, T. & S.F. Ry. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
unloading carload freight rests ordinarily upon the consignee. See National Wholesale Lumber Dealers' Association v. AtlanticSearch
-
Compare Covington Stock-Yards Co. v. KeithSearch
-
a month, the railroads paid the yards company its charges for unloading. 2. Prior to the decision in United States v. UnionSearch
-
Chicago Live Stock Exchange v. AtchisonSearch
-
commissionmen. The Commission so found, and this Court has heretofore so recognized. See Interstate Commerce Comm'n v. ChicagoSearch
-
Interstate Commerce Comm'n v. StickneySearch
-
is that the consignee can do it more effectively than the carrier. See National Wholesale Lumber Dealers' Assn. v. AtlanticSearch
-
by the defendants that the Stock Yards Company had been found by this Court to be a common carrier, United States v. UnionSearch
-
carriers, nor that it was entitled to collect a part of its charges from the shippers. Compare Missouri Pacific R. Co. v. Reynolds-DavisSearch
-
Union Stockyards Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
R. Co. v. AultSearch
-
Chicago Live Stock Exchange v. AtchisonSearch
-
charge was the subject of much litigation before the Commission and the courts. Interstate Commerce Comm'n v. ChicagoSearch
-
U. S. 98 . Compare Chicago Live Stock Exchange v. ChicagoSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Adams v. MillsSearch
-
See Chicago Live Stock Exchange v. AtchisonSearch
-
Southern Pacific Co. v. Darnell-TaenzerSearch
-
and Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. PageSearch
-
Missouri Portland Cement Co. v. DirectorSearch
-
New York Central & H.R. Co. v. YorkSearch
-
Compare Union Pac. R. Co. v. AmericanSearch
-
See Southern Pacific Co. v. Darnell-TaenzerSearch
-
Compare Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Sloss-SheffieldSearch
-
Compare Jennison Bros. & Co. v. DixonSearch
-
Compare Spiller v. AtchisonSearch
-
Compare Great Northern Ry. Co. v. Merchants'Search
-
Atchison, T. & S.F. Ry. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
See National Wholesale Lumber Dealers' Association v. AtlanticSearch
-
United States v. UnionSearch
-
See Interstate Commerce Comm'n v. ChicagoSearch
-
See National Wholesale Lumber Dealers' Assn. v. AtlanticSearch
-
Compare Missouri Pacific R. Co. v. Reynolds-DavisSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial