Citation network
Shapiro Vs. Wilgus
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 05, 1932
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 348 (1932) U.S. Supreme Court Shapiro v. WilgusSearch
-
U.S. 348 (1932) Shapiro v. WilgusSearch
-
a business conducted by an individual, as distinguished from one conducted by a corporation or a partnership. Hogsett v. ThompsonSearch
-
that, if suits can be staved off for a season, he will weather a financial storm, and pay his debts in full. Means v. DowdSearch
-
McKibbin v. MartinSearch
-
Stern's Appeal, 64 Pa. 447, 450. Tested by either act, this conveyance may not stand. Hogsett v. ThompsonSearch
-
Montgomery Page 287 U. S. 355 Web Co. v. DieneltSearch
-
Atlas Portland Cement Co. v. AmericanSearch
-
Kimball v. ThompsonSearch
-
Dearing v. McKinnonSearch
-
of a scheme whereby the form of a judicial remedy was to supply a protective cover for a fraudulent design. Harkin v. BrundageSearch
-
Decker v. DeckerSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
The design would have been ineffective if the debtor had been suffered to keep the business for himself. Hogsett v. ThompsonSearch
-
American Surety Co. Page 287 U. S. 356 v. ConnerSearch
-
N.Y. 1, 166 N.E. 783), but the rule in the federal courts remains what it has always been ( Pusey & Jones Co. v. HanessenSearch
-
Hollins v. BrierfieldSearch
-
the public good was not involved, where legitimate private interests might otherwise have suffered harm. United States v. Butterworth-JudsonSearch
-
Kingsport Press v. BriefSearch
-
that the remedy in such circumstances is not to be granted loosely, but is to be watched with jealous eyes. Michigan v. MichiganSearch
-
invoke the aid of equity to conserve the common fund for the benefit of himself and of the creditors at large. Hollins v. BrierfieldSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Shapiro v. WilgusSearch
-
Hogsett v. ThompsonSearch
-
Web Co. v. DieneltSearch
-
Pusey & Jones Co. v. HanessenSearch
-
United States v. Butterworth-JudsonSearch
-
Michigan v. MichiganSearch
-
Means v. DowdSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial