Citation network
Reichelderfer Vs. Quinn
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 05, 1932
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 315 (1932) U.S. Supreme Court Reichelderfer v. QuinnSearch
-
U.S. 315 (1932) Reichelderfer v. QuinnSearch
-
Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia, 60 App.D.C. 325, 53 F.2d 1079. Following its earlier decision in Quinn v. DoughertySearch
-
to the ownership of neighboring land, as does an easement of light and air, under the law of some states. See Muhlker v. HarlemSearch
-
R. Co., 197 U. S. 544 , 197 U. S. 564 . Compare Marchand v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
to invoke the police power, as petitioners do, to justify the construction of the engine house. Cf. Jackman v. RosenbaumSearch
-
the will of a particular Congress which does not impose itself upon those to follow in succeeding years. See Newton v. CommissionersSearch
-
Connecticut Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. SpratleySearch
-
of abutting property, is decreased when a public street or canal is closed or obstructed by public authority, Meyer v. RichmondSearch
-
Whitney v. NewSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Kirk v. MaumeeSearch
-
Smith v. BostonSearch
-
Stanwood v. MaldenSearch
-
or a street grade is raised, Smith v. WashingtonSearch
-
Mead v. PortlandSearch
-
or the location of a county seat, Newton v. CommissionersSearch
-
supra, or of a railroad is changed, Bryan v. LouisvilleSearch
-
in policy will lead the courts to recognize in old values new property rights. Compare International News Service v. AssociatedSearch
-
Press, 248 U. S. 215 , with Cheney Bros. v. DorisSearch
-
See Quinn v. DoughertySearch
-
body in fee and dedicated by statute to park purposes, it is within the legislative power to change the use, Clark v. ProvidenceSearch
-
Mowry v. ProvidenceSearch
-
Seattle Land & Improvement Co. v. SeattleSearch
-
Reichling v. CovingtonSearch
-
Higginson v. BostonSearch
-
or to make other disposition of the land, Wright v. WalcottSearch
-
Brooklyn Park Commissioners v. ArmstrongSearch
-
East Chicago Co. v. EastSearch
-
Whitney v. NewSearch
-
Eldridge v. BinghamtonSearch
-
See United States v. WelchSearch
-
in their favor, and the decision of this Court sustaining the constitutionality of the assessment provision ( Wilson v. LambertSearch
-
like other public grants, to be strictly construed for the protection of the public interest. Charles River Bridge v. WarrenSearch
-
Christ Church v. CountySearch
-
Larson v. SouthSearch
-
purpose, does not imply a promise to neighboring landowners that the park would be continued in perpetuity. Cf. Newton v. CommissionersSearch
-
See Wilson v. LambertSearch
-
Susquehanna Power Co. v. StateSearch
-
Burbank v. FaySearch
-
N.Y. 57, 64. So it was held in Thayer v. BostonSearch
-
F. 969, where contentions very similar to those made here were rejected. See also Brooklyn Park Commissioners v. ArmstrongSearch
-
has been reached with regard to the assessment of benefits arising from other types of public improvements, Whitney v. NewSearch
-
Chicago v. UnionSearch
-
Kean v. ElizabethSearch
-
Aged Women v. CommonwealthSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial