Citation network
Carpenter Vs. Shaw
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 06, 1930
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 363 (1930) U.S. Supreme Court Carpenter v. ShawSearch
-
U.S. 363 (1930) Carpenter v. ShawSearch
-
severed from the land, and so is a tax upon personalty not embraced within the exemption. 134 Okl. 35. In Choate v. TrappSearch
-
Indian tribes and tribal lands and in the performance of its duty as the guardian of its Indian wards, see Lone Wolf v. HitchcockSearch
-
in its constitution upon admission to statehood, was a limitation upon the taxing power of the state. See also Ward v. BoardSearch
-
concededly have been forbidden as a tax upon an instrumentality of the national government. See Choctaw & Gulf R. Co. v. HarrisonSearch
-
Howard v. GipsySearch
-
Large Oil Co. v. HowardSearch
-
must be narrowly construed to effect the Congressional purpose. See Shaw v. Gibson-ZahniserSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
in general tax exemptions are not to be presumed and statutes conferring them are to be strictly construed, Heiner v. ColonialSearch
-
to be applied to tax exemptions secured to the Indians by agreement between them and the national government. Choate v. TrappSearch
-
Worcester v. TheSearch
-
be taken to be its effect now, since it may not be narrowed by any subsequently declared intention of Congress. Choate v. TrappSearch
-
of the tax and its effect upon Page 280 U. S. 368 the federal right asserted. Choctaw, O. & Gulf R. Co. v. HarrisonSearch
-
Galveston, H. & S.A. R. Co. v. TexasSearch
-
interest of the lessor as a right attached and incident to his ownership or reversionary interest in the land. Barnes v. KeyesSearch
-
Strawn v. BradySearch
-
Harris v. BradySearch
-
Rich v. DonegheySearch
-
Okl. 204, and see Parker v. RileySearch
-
See Lake Superior Consol. Iron Mines v. LordSearch
-
Waggoner EState v. WichitaSearch
-
State v. SnyderSearch
-
Hearne v. LewisSearch
-
Condit v. NeighborSearch
-
York v. JonesSearch
-
Burden v. ThayerSearch
-
Nelson v. JoshelSearch
-
Frerich v. AbramsSearch
-
Macdonough v. StarbirdSearch
-
Cal. 15, 19, 38 P. 510. Compare Pollock v. FarmersSearch
-
of statutory penalties. These allegations are sufficient to bring the case within the ruling of this Court in Ward v. BoardSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Carpenter v. ShawSearch
-
In Choate v. TrappSearch
-
Ward v. BoardSearch
-
See Choctaw & Gulf R. Co. v. HarrisonSearch
-
See Shaw v. Gibson-ZahniserSearch
-
Heiner v. ColonialSearch
-
of Congress. Choate v. TrappSearch
-
Choctaw, O. & Gulf R. Co. v. HarrisonSearch
-
Barnes v. KeyesSearch
-
Rich v. DonegheySearch
-
Parker v. RileySearch
-
Compare Pollock v. FarmersSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial