Citation network
Patton Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 14, 1930
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Patton v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 281 U.S. 276 (1930) U.S. Supreme Court Patton v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 281 U.S. 276 (1930) Patton v. UnitedSearch
-
and (3) that the verdict should be unanimous. As to the first of these requisites, it is enough to cite Thompson v. UtahSearch
-
The second requisite was expressly dealt with in Capital Traction Company v. HofSearch
-
The third requisite was held essential in American Publishing Company v. FisherSearch
-
the legislative department to destroy or abridge. What was said by Mr. Justice Brewer in American Publishing Company v. FisherSearch
-
doubting the validity of a waiver of a considerable number of jurors, or of a jury altogether. See, for example, State v. KaufmanSearch
-
Iowa 578, 580, with which compare State v. WilliamsSearch
-
Ross v. EganSearch
-
Pa. 251, 256, with which compare Commonwealth v. HallSearch
-
for the distinction. Other state courts, with, we think, better reason, have adopted a contrary view. In State v. BaerSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
person to plead guilty, and thus waive any trial, he must necessarily be able to waive a jury trial. In Jennings v. StateSearch
-
without more, be answered in the negative. Defendants strongly rely upon the language of this court in Thompson v. UtahSearch
-
Defendants also cite as supporting their contention two decisions of federal circuit courts of appeal, namely, Low v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 169 Fed. 86, and Dickinson v. UnitedSearch
-
has been characterized as involving innovation 'highly dangerous,' it would, as said by Judge Seevers in State v. KaufmanSearch
-
the two provisions mean substantially the same thing, and this is the effect of the holding of this court in Callan v. WilsonSearch
-
provisions. The power of waiver being established, this is the clear import of the decision of this court in Schick v. UnitedSearch
-
Page 281 U. S. 300 See also In re Belt, 159 U. S. 95 , and Riddle v. DycheSearch
-
a jury in criminal cases in the District of Columbia. The Court of Appeals of that District upheld the statute in Belt v. UnitedSearch
-
in relation to that instrument, as a contemporaneous exposition of the highest authority. Capital Traction Company v. HofSearch
-
it was competent for the parties to waive a trial by jury. The early cases are collected in a footnote to Kearney v. CaseSearch
-
case in support of the proposition, and one which has influenced other decisions advancing similar views, is Cancemi v. TheSearch
-
A decision flatly to the contrary, and one fairly representative of others to the same effect, is State v. KaufmanSearch
-
State v. SackettSearch
-
justified by conditions which no longer exist, and, as the Supreme Court of Nevada well said in Reno Smelting Works v. StevensonSearch
-
upon a substantial basis. In this respect, we fully agree with what was said by the Supreme Court of Wisconsin in Hack v. StateSearch
-
There are decisions to that effect, and also decisions to the contrary. The conflict is marked and direct. Schick v. UnitedSearch
-
In Commonwealth v. BeardSearch
-
by one charged with a grave crime and when asserted by one charged with a lesser one. Hence, when it is held in Schick v. UnitedSearch
-
This view of the matter subsequently had the approval of the supreme court of the state in Commonwealth ex rel. Ross v. EganSearch
-
Com. v. BeardSearch
-
Commonwealth v. RoweSearch
-
State v. RossSearch
-
S.D. 188, 192-193, involving a misdemeanor, but followed in State v. TiedemanSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Patton v. UnitedSearch
-
Thompson v. UtahSearch
-
Capital Traction Company v. HofSearch
-
American Publishing Company v. FisherSearch
-
State v. KaufmanSearch
-
State v. WilliamsSearch
-
Ross v. EganSearch
-
Commonwealth v. HallSearch
-
In State v. BaerSearch
-
In Jennings v. StateSearch
-
Low v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial