Citation network
Henrietta Mills Vs. Rutherford
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 14, 1930
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 121 (1930) U.S. Supreme Court Henrietta Mills v. RutherfordSearch
-
U.S. 121 (1930) Henrietta Mills v. RutherfordSearch
-
The Supreme Court of North Carolina, in Norfolk-Southern Railroad Co. v. BoardSearch
-
Murdock v. PageSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Hilliard v. AshevilleSearch
-
Schaul v. CharlotteSearch
-
Range Co. v. CarverSearch
-
Sherrod v. DawsonSearch
-
Lumber Co. v. SmithSearch
-
Purnell v. PageSearch
-
could have applied to the state court for an injunction, the complainant also had an adequate remedy at law. Schaul v. CharlotteSearch
-
Teeter v. WallaceSearch
-
Blackwell v. CitySearch
-
Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. MecklenburgSearch
-
Carstarphen v. PlymouthSearch
-
N.C. 90. This is not a matter of doubt, as in Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. WeldSearch
-
County, 247 U. S. 282 , 247 U. S. 285 , and Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. DoughtonSearch
-
existence of such a remedy has reference to the adequacy of the remedy on the law side of the federal courts ( Smyth v. AmesSearch
-
Chicago, B. & Q. Railroad Co. v. OsborneSearch
-
Risty v. ChicagoSearch
-
enforcement may be had in a federal court, provided a ground exists for invoking the federal jurisdiction. Clark v. SmithSearch
-
Lawson v. UnitedSearch
-
Pusey & Jones Co. v. HanessenSearch
-
or conflict with any inhibition imposed, by the constitution or laws of the United States. This Court said, in Scott v. NeelySearch
-
therefore be obliged to deny an equitable remedy which the plaintiff might have had in a state court. Pusey & Jones v. HanessenSearch
-
objection may be treated as waived by the party entitled to raise it, the prohibition is not to be disregarded. Reynes v. DumontSearch
-
American Mills Co. v. AmericanSearch
-
Dows v. CitySearch
-
Railway v. BoardSearch
-
Arkansas Building & Loan Association v. MaddenSearch
-
Indiana Manufacturing Co. v. KoehneSearch
-
Boise Artesian Water Co. v. BoiseSearch
-
Dalton Adding Machine Co. v. StateSearch
-
Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. WeldSearch
-
Keokuk Bridge Co. v. SalmSearch
-
Bond v. TarboroSearch
-
Hunt v. CooperSearch
-
Southern Railway Co. v. CherokeeSearch
-
See Cummings v. NationalSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial