Citation network
Jamison Vs. Encarnacion
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 26, 1930
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Distinguished
-
U.S. 635 (1930) U.S. Supreme Court Jamison v. EncarnacionSearch
-
U.S. 635 (1930) Jamison v. EncarnacionSearch
-
Employers' Liability Act applies and, after quoting the language of this Court in International Stevedoring Co. v. HavertySearch
-
the case is governed by the maritime law as modified by the acts of Congress above referred to. Northern Coal Co. v. StrandSearch
-
Minneapolis, R. Co. v. RockSearch
-
would defeat an obvious legislative purpose or lessen the scope plainly intended to be given to the measure. Johnson v. SouthernSearch
-
Gooch v. OregonSearch
-
Barrett v. VanSearch
-
Johnson v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 163 F. 30, 32. Cf. Hackfeld & Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 197 U. S. 442 , 197 U. S. 449 et seq. Cf. Hackfeld & Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
the word may be read to include all the meanings given to it by courts and within the word as ordinarily used. Miller v. RobertsonSearch
-
As the Federal Employers' Liability Act does not create liability without fault ( Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. HortonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
courts call willful misconduct evincing intention or willingness to cause injury to another gross negligence. Bolin v. ChicagoSearch
-
St.P., M. & O. Railway Co., 108 Wis. 333, and cases cited. And see Peoria Bridge Association v. LoomisSearch
-
Chicago, R.I. & P. Ry. Co. v. HamlerSearch
-
Ill. 525, and cases cited. Mercer v. CorbinSearch
-
in order to induce her to remain at work was not a trespass as distinguished from a careless or negligent act. Richard v. AmoskeagSearch
-
to hold that the assault, a much graver breach of duty, was not negligence within the meaning of the act. Johnson v. SouthernSearch
-
Schlemmer v. BuffaloSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Jamison v. EncarnacionSearch
-
Northern Coal Co. v. StrandSearch
-
Johnson v. SouthernSearch
-
Cf. Hackfeld & Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Miller v. RobertsonSearch
-
Bolin v. ChicagoSearch
-
Peoria Bridge Association v. LoomisSearch
-
Mercer v. CorbinSearch
-
Richard v. AmoskeagSearch
-
Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. HortonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial