Citation network
Poe Vs. Seaborn
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Nov 24, 1930
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 101 (1930) U.S. Supreme Court Poe v. SeabornSearch
-
U.S. 101 (1930) Poe v. SeabornSearch
-
the Revenue Act to spell out a lack of uniformity. P. 282 U. S. 117 . 32 F.2d 916 affirmed. United States v. RobbinsSearch
-
U. S. 376 , and Lucas v. EarlSearch
-
the wife's interest as co owner. The wife may borrow for community purposes and bind the community property. Fielding v. KetlerSearch
-
she may, suing alone, enjoin collection of his separate debt out of community property. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. ClarkSearch
-
P. 35. She may prevent his making substantial gifts out of community property without her consent. Parker v. ParkerSearch
-
property is not liable for the husband's torts not committed in carrying on the business of the community. Schramm v. SteeleSearch
-
Marston v. RueSearch
-
Mabie v. WhittakerSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Washington and of the rights of the spouses, and of the powers of the husband as manager, will be found in Warburton v. WhiteSearch
-
The community must act through an agent. This Court has said with respect to the community property system ( Warburton v. WhiteSearch
-
agency on both spouses, if it saw fit -- all without infringing any property right of the husband. See also Arnett v. ReadeSearch
-
tax community income to the husband in Washington and certain other states, in view of our decision in United States v. RobbinsSearch
-
applicable to words which Congress repeatedly reemployed in acts passed subsequent to such construction ( New York v. IllinoisSearch
-
National Lead Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
urges that we have, in principle, decided the instant question in favor of the government. He relies on United States v. RobbinsSearch
-
argument, however, is that the constitutional requirement of uniformity is not intrinsic, but geographic. Billings v. UnitedSearch
-
designated by Congress as taxable, may not be read into the Revenue Act to spell out a lack of uniformity. Florida v. MellonSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Poe v. SeabornSearch
-
and Lucas v. EarlSearch
-
Fielding v. KetlerSearch
-
Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. ClarkSearch
-
Parker v. ParkerSearch
-
Schramm v. SteeleSearch
-
Warburton v. WhiteSearch
-
New York v. IllinoisSearch
-
Billings v. UnitedSearch
-
Florida v. MellonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial