Citation network
Crooks Vs. Harrelson
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Nov 24, 1930
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 55 (1930) U.S. Supreme Court Crooks v. HarrelsonSearch
-
U.S. 55 (1930) Crooks v. HarrelsonSearch
-
subject to the latter, it forms no part of the gross estate for the purpose of the federal estate tax. United States v. FieldSearch
-
discriminating terms of the statute. A similar question was presented to this Court and decided in United States v. FieldSearch
-
The principle sought to be applied is that Page 282 U. S. 60 followed by this Court in Holy Trinity Church v. UnitedSearch
-
the law upon that ground, the absurdity must be so gross as to shock the general moral or common sense. Compare Pirie v. ChicagoSearch
-
there must be something to make plain the intent of Congress that the letter of the statute is not to prevail. Treat v. WhiteSearch
-
power as to call, rather, for great caution and circumspection in order to avoid usurpation of the latter. Monson v. ChesterSearch
-
King v. CommissionersSearch
-
Abley v. DaleSearch
-
L.J. (1851) N.S. Pt. 2, Vol. 20, 233, 235. And see generally Chung Fook v. WhiteSearch
-
regard to which the general rule requiring adherence to the letter applies with peculiar strictness. In United States v. MerriamSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
we quoted with approval the words of Lord Cairns in Partington v. AttorneySearch
-
of administration, but an expense incidental to the sale of the lands. The Missouri court of appeals, in Elstroth v. YoungSearch
-
Page 282 U. S. 63 We have not failed to note the decision of the Court of Claims in Steedman v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 63 Ct.Cls. 226, as well as the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals in Bartlett v. CommissionerSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Crooks v. HarrelsonSearch
-
Holy Trinity Church v. UnitedSearch
-
Compare Pirie v. ChicagoSearch
-
Treat v. WhiteSearch
-
Monson v. ChesterSearch
-
In United States v. MerriamSearch
-
Partington v. AttorneySearch
-
Elstroth v. YoungSearch
-
Steedman v. UnitedSearch
-
Bartlett v. CommissionerSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial