Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Weil Vs. Neary

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 02, 1929

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

42 entries 4 linked 38 unlinked
Show
  1. Valdes Vs. Larrinaga US Supreme Court · May 25, 1914
  2. Meguire Vs. Corwine US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1879
  3. Hobbs Vs. Mclean US Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1886
  4. Rio Grande Irrigation Co. Vs. Gildersleeve US Supreme Court · May 15, 1899
  5. U.S. 160 (1929) U.S. Supreme Court Weil v. Neary
    Search
  6. U.S. 160 (1929) Weil v. Neary
    Search
  7. Josiah v. Thompson
    Search
  8. that this Court may not examine the findings to determine whether they support the judgment, and he relies on Campbell v. United
    Search
  9. and adopts, the appellate court may examine the findings and determine whether they support the judgment. Shipman v. Straitsville
    Search
  10. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. v. Clark
    Search
  11. Boogher v. New
    Search
  12. Paine v. Central
    Search
  13. David Lupton's Sons v. Auto
    Search
  14. those who claim illegality, and that, in such cases, the principle res magis valeat quam pereat applies. Hobbs v. McLean
    Search
  15. Baltimore & Ohio S.W. Ry. v. Voight
    Search
  16. Steele v. Drummond
    Search
  17. O. Canal Co. v. Hill
    Search
  18. Curtis v. Gokey
    Search
  19. Dykers v. Townsend
    Search
  20. Ormes v. Dauchy
    Search
  21. Shedlinsky v. Budweiser
    Search
  22. Lorillard v. Clyde
    Search
  23. It is clear that a rule of court thus authorized and made has the force of law. Rio Grande Irrigation Co. v. Gildersleeve
    Search
  24. Thompson v. Hatch
    Search
  25. District of Columbia v. Roth
    Search
  26. Murphy v. Gould
    Search
  27. Wilkinson Page 278 U. S. 170 v. Walker
    Search
  28. Whitaker v. Lankford
    Search
  29. Advance Vencer & Lumber Co. v. Horaday
    Search
  30. does not follow would destroy the safeguards of the law and lessen the prevention of abuses. Providence Tool Co. v. Norris
    Search
  31. Woodstock Iron Co. v. Richmond
    Search
  32. Oscanyan v. Winchester
    Search
  33. Connors v. Connolly
    Search
  34. Richardson v. Crandall
    Search
  35. Palmbaum v. Magulsky
    Search
  36. U.S. Supreme Court Weil v. Neary
    Search
  37. Josiah v. Thompson
    Search
  38. Campbell v. United
    Search
  39. Shipman v. Straitsville
    Search
  40. Chesapeake & O. Canal Co. v. Hill
    Search
  41. Whitaker v. Lankford
    Search
  42. Providence Tool Co. v. Norris
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial