Citation network
Larson Vs. South Dakota
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 18, 1929
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Larson v. SouthSearch
-
Dakota - 278 U.S. 429 (1929) U.S. Supreme Court Larson v. SouthSearch
-
Dakota, 278 U.S. 429 (1929) Larson v. SouthSearch
-
before it twice before this case, in Nixon v. ReidSearch
-
S.D. 507, and in Chamberlain Ferry & Cable Bridge v. KingSearch
-
the contract means, and whether by a proper construction, the building of a bridge impairs its obligation. Appleby v. CitySearch
-
Columbia Ry. Co. v. SouthSearch
-
Louisiana Ry. & Navigation Co. v. BehrmanSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Mobile & Ohio R. Co. v. TennesseeSearch
-
Northwestern University v. IllinoisSearch
-
Bridge Proprietors v. HobokenSearch
-
necessarily arises that a bridge would be a breach of the leases. Reference is made to Newburgh & C. Turnpike Co. v. MillerSearch
-
It was observed in the case of Ogden v. GibbonsSearch
-
a public grant like this. The leading case on the subject in federal jurisprudence is that of Charles River Bridge v. WarrenSearch
-
Hart v. LamphireSearch
-
Beaty v. LesseeSearch
-
Page 278 U. S. 437 The same principle is declared in Fanning v. GregoireSearch
-
How. 524, 57 U. S. 534 , Wright v. NagleSearch
-
U. S. 791 , 101 U. S. 796 , Wheeling & Belmont Bridge Co. v. WheelingSearch
-
Bridge Co., 138 U. S. 287 , 138 U. S. 293 , and Williams v. WingoSearch
-
is only created by clear language, and is not to be extended by implication beyond the terms of the statute. Fanning v. GregoireSearch
-
to be made enlarging his grant, as seems to have been the view of Chancellor Kent in Newburgh & C. Turnpike Co. v. MillerSearch
-
franchise should be construed to cover all methods of travel and transportation across the water is rejected in Dyer v. TuskaloosaSearch
-
Piatt v. CovingtonSearch
-
Snidow v. BoardSearch
-
Dibden v. SkirrowSearch
-
Ch. 41. There are many strong dicta to this same effect. Morey v. OrfordSearch
-
Piscataqua Bridge v. NewSearch
-
Bush v. PeruSearch
-
McPherson Bros. v. SuperiorSearch
-
that a contractual term forbidding a ferry or a toll bridge does not exclude a railroad bridge. Mohawk Bridge Co. v. UticaSearch
-
McLeod v. SavannahSearch
-
Hopkins v. GreatSearch
-
Northern Ry., 2 Q.B.D. 224 (1877), overruling Regina v. CambrianSearch
-
Enfield Toll Bridge Co. v. HartfordSearch
-
New Haven R. Co., 17 Conn. 40 (1845). There is some conflicting authority on the main question. Gates v. McDanielSearch
-
Norris v. Farmers'Search
-
Menzel Estate Co. v. CitySearch
-
Blanchard v. AbrahamSearch
-
or injury to tangible property which affected the decisions. The strongest case for the appellant is Mason v. Harper'sSearch
-
could take away at any time all the exclusive privileges of the proprietors theretofore existing. In Hopkins v. GreatSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Larson v. SouthSearch
-
Nixon v. ReidSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial