Citation network
Sinclair Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 08, 1929
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Sinclair v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 279 U.S. 263 (1929) U.S. Supreme Court Sinclair v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 279 U.S. 263 (1929) Sinclair v. UnitedSearch
-
bounds of the power are exceeded or where the questions asked are not pertinent to the matter under inquiry. McGrain v. DaughertySearch
-
supplemental contract was made by which the company agreed to furnish storage facilities for the Navy. Mammoth Oil Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Petroleum Company purporting to grant to it the right to take oil and gas from Reserve No. 1. Pan American Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
as a witness without being summoned, as well as to the case of one required to attend. By our opinion in McGrain v. DaughertySearch
-
the purpose of the courts well to uphold the right of privacy, we quote from some of their decisions. In Kilbourn v. ThompsonSearch
-
And the learned Justice, referring to Kilbourn v. ThompsonSearch
-
Judge Sawyer, p. 259 at 263, and of District Judge Sabin, p. 268 at p. 269. In Interstate Commerce Commission v. BrimsonSearch
-
can be invested with a general power of making inquiry into the private affairs of the citizen. . . . We said in Boyd v. UnitedSearch
-
Harriman v. InterstateSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Act of Congress to authorize any examination of witnesses in respect of their personal affairs. And see United States v. LouisvilleSearch
-
Nashville R. Co., 236 U. S. 318 , 236 U. S. 335 . In Federal Trade Commission v. AmericanSearch
-
authorize one of its subordinate agencies to sweep all our traditions into the fire ( Interstate Commerce Commission v. BrimsonSearch
-
The context and circumstances show that Resolution 294 was intended to be kept in force. See School District No. 11 v. ChapmanSearch
-
proprietor, and was authorized to deal with it as a private individual may deal with lands owned by him. United States v. MidwestSearch
-
And the materiality of what is falsely sworn, when an element in the crime of perjury, is one for the court. Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. SingletonSearch
-
Cothran v. StateSearch
-
to well established principles to leave the determination of such a matter to a jury. Interstate Commerce Commission v. BrimsonSearch
-
Horning v. DistrictSearch
-
answer. He was bound rightly to construe the statute. His mistaken view of the law is no defense. Armour Packing Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Standard Sanitary Mfg. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
authorized as punishment for the offense charged in the first count, we need not consider any other count. Abrams v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Sinclair v. UnitedSearch
-
the Navy. Mammoth Oil Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Pan American Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
In Kilbourn v. ThompsonSearch
-
Kilbourn v. ThompsonSearch
-
In Interstate Commerce Commission v. BrimsonSearch
-
Boyd v. UnitedSearch
-
In Federal Trade Commission v. AmericanSearch
-
United States v. MidwestSearch
-
Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
Armour Packing Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Abrams v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial