Citation network
Helson and Randolph Vs. Kentucky
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 08, 1929
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Distinguished
-
U.S. 245 (1929) U.S. Supreme Court Helson and Randolph v. KentuckySearch
-
U.S. 245 (1929) Helson and Randolph v. KentuckySearch
-
court rendered judgment for the commonwealth, which was affirmed by the state court of appeals. Metropolis Ferry Co. v. CommonwealthSearch
-
to another is interstate commerce, and immune from the interference of such state legislation. Gloucester Ferry Co. v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
embraces within its control all the instrumentalities by which that commerce may be carried on. Gloucester Ferry Co. v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
Leloup v. PortSearch
-
Ozark Pipe Line v. MonierSearch
-
the imposition of a tax which is, in effect, a tax for the privilege of transacting such commerce. Adams Express Co. v. OhioSearch
-
selling or seeking to sell the goods of a nonresident within the state prior to their introduction therein, Stockard v. MorganSearch
-
securing or seeking to secure the transportation of freight or passengers in interstate or foreign commerce, McCall v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Texas Transp. Co. v. NewSearch
-
U. S. 150 . Nor can a state impose a tax on alien passengers coming by vessels from foreign countries. New York v. CompagnieSearch
-
Gen. Transatlantique, 107 U. S. 59 . And see 48 U. S. 7 How. 283. In Minot v. PhiladelphiaSearch
-
or using of sleeping cars within the state in the transportation of interstate passengers. Pullman Southern Car Co. v. NolanSearch
-
the decision was affirmed and the tax condemned as one laid on the right of transit between states. Sub nom. Pickard v. PullmanSearch
-
foreign countries or between states is to regulate commerce, and is beyond state power. The doctrine of Crandall v. NevadaSearch
-
Henderson v. NewSearch
-
Pickard v. PullmanSearch
-
state to points outside, which was held invalid (inadvertently on the ground that it was a tax on exports) in Almy v. CaliforniaSearch
-
How. 169, was characterized in Woodruff v. ParhamSearch
-
and persons between one state Page 279 U. S. 252 and another which is within the rule laid down in Crandall v. NevadaSearch
-
Gloucester Ferry Co. v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
Page 279 U. S. 253 tax on property, measured by its use or use value in interstate commerce. Cudahy Packing Co. v. MinnesotaSearch
-
Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry. Co. v. BackusSearch
-
Adams Express Co. v. OhioSearch
-
Western Union Tel. Co. v. MissouriSearch
-
Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Helson and Randolph v. KentuckySearch
-
Metropolis Ferry Co. v. CommonwealthSearch
-
Stockard v. MorganSearch
-
McCall v. CaliforniaSearch
-
New York v. CompagnieSearch
-
In Minot v. PhiladelphiaSearch
-
Pullman Southern Car Co. v. NolanSearch
-
of Crandall v. NevadaSearch
-
Almy v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Crandall v. NevadaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial