Citation network
Riehle Vs. Margolies
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 08, 1929
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 218 (1929) U.S. Supreme Court Riehle v. MargoliesSearch
-
U.S. 218 (1929) Riehle v. MargoliesSearch
-
federal court. Margolies did not, so far as appears, challenge the jurisdiction of the federal court. Compare Harkin v. BrundageSearch
-
Lion Bonding & Surety Co. v. KaratzSearch
-
Pusey & Jones Co. v. HanessenSearch
-
but supplemented by the opinions of the circuit court of appeals shows the following. On the first appeal, Hatch v. MoroscoSearch
-
claim be dismissed. The order was the subject of another Page 279 U. S. 222 appeal by Margolies. Hatch v. MoroscoSearch
-
by the district court. The receiver appealed to the circuit court of appeals. It affirmed the judgment, Hatch v. MoroscoSearch
-
to the preservation, collection, and distribution of the assets. It may do this either in the original suit, Rouse v. LetcherSearch
-
U. S. 47 , 156 U. S. 49 -50, or by ancillary proceedings, White v. EwingSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U. S. 36 . Compare Kelley v. GillSearch
-
or otherwise, all writs necessary to protect from interference all property in its possession. Julian v. CentralSearch
-
court the exclusive right to determine all questions or rights of action affecting the debtor's estate. Calhoun v. LanauxSearch
-
as to the subject matter of a suit pending in a state court when the receivership suit was begun. Compare Haines v. CarpenterSearch
-
of the Judicial Code. Compare Hull v. BurrSearch
-
U. S. 712 , 234 U. S. 723 . Wells Fargo & Co. v. TaylorSearch
-
Essanay Film Co. v. KaneSearch
-
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. WellsSearch
-
in the possession of a receiver, except upon application to the court which appointed him. Lion Bonding & Surety Co. v. KaratzSearch
-
distribution awaiting disposition of litigation in another court over a contested claim. Compare Wm. Filine's Sons Co. v. WeedSearch
-
Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. NewSearch
-
as res judicata, in the absence of fraud or collusion, even if obtained upon a default. Last Chance Mining Co. v. TylerSearch
-
Mining Co., 157 U. S. 683 , 157 U. S. 691 . Compare Northern Pacific Ry. Co. v. SlaghtSearch
-
the fact which entitles one to share in a decedent's estate in course of administration in a state court. Yonley v. LavenderSearch
-
Page 279 U. S. 226 Byers v. McAuleySearch
-
Waterman v. Canal-LouisianaSearch
-
established conclusively in bankruptcy the existence and amount of the debt provable against the estate. Norton v. SwitzerSearch
-
U. S. 355 , 93 U. S. 363 -364. Compare Hill v. HardingSearch
-
commenced in a state court before the appointment is binding upon the receivers as well as upon the bank. Speckert v. GermanSearch
-
In Pendleton v. RussellSearch
-
and the judgment entered there is conclusive as between the parties and their privies in the federal court. Kline v. BurkeSearch
-
Dillingham v. HawkSearch
-
St. Louis S.W. Ry. Co. v. HolbrookSearch
-
Willcox v. JonesSearch
-
Manhattan Trust Co. v. ChicagoSearch
-
American Brake Shoe & Foundry Co. v. PereSearch
-
International & Great Northern Ry. Co. v. AdkinsSearch
-
Mercantile Trust Co. v. PittsburgSearch
-
Wilder v. CitySearch
-
Co. v. CheshireSearch
-
United States v. IllinoisSearch
-
Pringle v. WoolworthSearch
-
Taylor v. GraySearch
-
St. Louis, B. & M. Ry. Co. v. GreenSearch
-
by Judge John K. Beach, 30 Yale Law Journal 674. Compare Central Trust Co. v. D'ArcySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial