Citation network
Ex Parte Bakelite Corp.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 20, 1929
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
court, but not on a constitutional court established under Article III. P. 279 U. S. 454 . 6. In Miles v. GrahamSearch
-
or during good behavior. The first pronouncement on the subject by this Court was in American Insurance Co. v. CanterSearch
-
The nature of the proceedings in the Court of Claims and the power of Congress over them are illustrated in McElrath v. UnitedSearch
-
In Gordon v. UnitedSearch
-
on that basis, distinctly recognized that Congress may require it to give advisory decisions. And in United States v. KleinSearch
-
under the control of Congress. In the present case, the court below regarded the recent decision in Miles v. GrahamSearch
-
cited, and holding that the Court of Claims is a constitutional, rather than a legislative, court. But, in this, Miles v. GrahamSearch
-
taken in this case as disturbing the earlier rulings or attributing to the Court of Claims a changed status. Webster v. FallSearch
-
U. S. 507 , 266 U. S. 511 . That court was said to be a constitutional court in United States v. UnionSearch
-
and adjudicating, as between claimants and the United States, all claims not already determined. In United States v. CoeSearch
-
distributed, Congress chose to create a special court and to authorize it to determine the controversies. In Wallace v. AdamsSearch
-
here that, in so ruling, this Court approvingly cited and gave effect to the opinion of Chief Justice Taney in Gordon v. UnitedSearch
-
Reynolds v. UnitedSearch
-
McAllister v. UnitedSearch
-
Keller v. PotomacSearch
-
Postum Cereal Co. v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Fig Nut Co., 272 U. S. 693 , 272 U. S. 700 . And see Butterworth v. HoeSearch
-
American China Development Co. v. BoydSearch
-
Biddle v. UnitedSearch
-
Swayne & Hoyt v. EverettSearch
-
Fleming v. UnitedSearch
-
Wulfsohn v. Russo-AsiaticSearch
-
Murray's Lessee v. HobokenSearch
-
Nishimura Ekiu v. UnitedSearch
-
Astiazaran v. SantaSearch
-
Passavant v. UnitedSearch
-
Fong Yue Ting v. UnitedSearch
-
Gordon v. UnitedSearch
-
La Abra Silver Mining Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Luckenbach S.S. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. FerriraSearch
-
De Groot v. UnitedSearch
-
McElrath v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. LouisianaSearch
-
Schillinger v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial