Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Brown Vs. United States

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Feb 20, 1928

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

26 entries 2 linked 24 unlinked
Show
  1. Hale Vs. Henkel US Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1906
  2. Consolidated Rendering Co. Vs. Vermont US Supreme Court · Jan 08, 1908
  3. Brown v. United
    Search
  4. States - 276 U.S. 134 (1928) U.S. Supreme Court Brown v. United
    Search
  5. States, 276 U.S. 134 (1928) Brown v. United
    Search
  6. convicted, and judgment rendered against it and satisfied by execution out of its assets. United Mine Workers v. Coronado
    Search
  7. Dowd v. United
    Search
  8. and executed to these ends, but that a subpoena duces tecum without an ad testificandum clause ( Wilson v. United
    Search
  9. no doubt that the subpoena here directed to the association and served on such officer is valid. 2. In Hale v. Henkel
    Search
  10. with reasonable particularity the subjects to which the documents called for relate. The question is ruled not by Hale v. Henkel
    Search
  11. but by Consolidated Rendering Co. v. Vermont
    Search
  12. U. S. 541 , 207 U. S. 553 -554, and Wheeler v. United
    Search
  13. there is no reason why he should not produce them again in response to another subpoena identical in terms. See Lee v. Angas
    Search
  14. Starr v. Mayer
    Search
  15. to show reasonable ground for his refusal to comply with the requirements of the subpoena. Consolidated Rendering Co. v. Vermont
    Search
  16. As very pertinently said by the Court of Page 276 U. S. 145 Appeals of Kentucky in Commonwealth v. Southern
    Search
  17. United States v. Collins
    Search
  18. Mitchell's Case, 12 Abb.Pr. 249, 260-261. And see generally Blair v. United
    Search
  19. U.S. Supreme Court Brown v. United
    Search
  20. United Mine Workers v. Coronado
    Search
  21. Wilson v. United
    Search
  22. In Hale v. Henkel
    Search
  23. and Wheeler v. United
    Search
  24. See Lee v. Angas
    Search
  25. Commonwealth v. Southern
    Search
  26. Blair v. United
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales