Citation network
Swift and Co. Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 19, 1928
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Swift & Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 276 U.S. 311 (1928) U.S. Supreme Court Swift & Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 276 U.S. 311 (1928) Swift & Company v. UnitedSearch
-
Court of the District of Columbia has power to administer relief under the Anti-Trust Act ( Federal Trade Comm'n v. KlesnerSearch
-
and that of the California Cooperative Canneries, allowed September 13, 1924. See California Co-op. Canneries v. UnitedSearch
-
Gas Co. v. DittmanSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
the Act of February 13, 1925, the appeals should have been transferred to this Court. Compare Pascagoula National Bank v. FederalSearch
-
Salinger v. UnitedSearch
-
Rossi v. UnitedSearch
-
Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
jurisdiction of the whole case had it come before us on writ of error or appeal. Wagner Electric Manufacturing Co. v. LyndonSearch
-
Waggoner Estate v. WichitaSearch
-
could not be set aside by appeal or bill of Page 276 U. S. 324 review except in case of clerical error. Webb v. WebbSearch
-
Bradish v. GeeSearch
-
appeal or bill of review where there was a claim of lack of actual consent to the decree as entered ( Pacific R. Co. v. KetchumSearch
-
U. S. 128 , 158 U. S. 147 ), or of fraud in its procurement ( Thompson v. MaxwellSearch
-
or that there was lack of federal jurisdiction because of the citizenship of the parties ( Pacific R. Co. v. KetchumSearch
-
supra ). Compare Fraenkl v. CerecedoSearch
-
Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Ry. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 113 U. S. 261 , 113 U. S. 266 . Compare United States v. BabbittSearch
-
the Anti-Trust Act. After entry of the case in this Court, that contention was disposed of by Federal Trade Commission v. KlesnerSearch
-
South Spring Hill Gold Mining Co. Page 276 U. S. 326 v. AmadorSearch
-
California v. SanSearch
-
that an injunction may issue to prevent future wrong although no right has yet been violated. Vicksburg Waterworks Co. v. VicksburgSearch
-
Pierce v. SocietySearch
-
the error is one which could have been corrected only by an appeal or by a bill of review. Compare Pacific R. Co. v. KetchumSearch
-
Kennedy v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Des Moines Navigation Co. v. IowaSearch
-
Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. McCabeSearch
-
of the bill not specifically denied may have afforded ample basis for a decree limited to future acts. Deputron v. YoungSearch
-
of a character ordinarily remediable on appeal. Such an error is waived by the consent to the decree. United States v. BabbittSearch
-
U. S. 295 . Clearly it does not go to the power of the court to adjudicate between the parties. Voorhees v. BankSearch
-
Christianson v. KingSearch
-
alone, might be open on appeal to the objection that they are too general to be sanctioned. Compare Swift & Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
They are to be read in connection with other paragraphs of the decree and with the allegations of the bill. Barnes v. ChicagoSearch
-
City of Vicksburg v. HensonSearch
-
involves usurpation by the judicial branch of the government of the function of Congress. Compare United States v. NewSearch
-
do this is not merely unauthorized by, but is contrary to, the common law and the Anti-Trust Act. Compare Nordenfelt v. MaximSearch
-
United States v. AddystonSearch
-
that there was no finding of an interweaving of intrastate and interstate transactions, as in United States v. NewSearch
-
U. S. 464 , or that the intrastate transactions had any relation to interstate operations, as in Swift & Co. v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial