Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Nigro Vs. United States

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 09, 1928

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

37 entries 8 linked 29 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Katz US Supreme Court · May 24, 1926
  2. Nicol Vs. Ames US Supreme Court · Apr 08, 1899
  3. Knowlton Vs. Moore US Supreme Court · May 14, 1900
  4. United States Vs. Daugherty US Supreme Court · Jan 04, 1926
  5. United States Vs. Doremus US Supreme Court · Mar 03, 1919
  6. Hammer Vs. Dagenhart US Supreme Court · Jun 03, 1918
  7. United States Vs. Wong US Supreme Court · May 23, 1977
  8. United States Vs. Balint US Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1922
  9. Nigro v. United
    Search
  10. States - 276 U.S. 332 (1928) U.S. Supreme Court Nigro v. United
    Search
  11. States, 276 U.S. 332 (1928) Nigro v. United
    Search
  12. The second question was invoked by what we said in United States v. Daugherty
    Search
  13. The constitutionality of the Anti-Narcotic Act, touching which this Court so sharply divided in United States v. Doremus
    Search
  14. U. S. 86 , was not raised below, and has not been again considered. The doctrine approved in Hammer v. Dagenhart
    Search
  15. U. S. 44 , 259 U. S. 67 , and Linder v. United
    Search
  16. In Alston v. United
    Search
  17. and must be regarded as invalid, just as the Child Labor Act of Congress was held to be, in Bailey, Collector v. Drexel
    Search
  18. in what is in effect a duplication of punishment for substantially the same crime, as in the case of United States v. Katz
    Search
  19. to that of those persons only who are required to register and pay the tax as there was in United States v. Jin
    Search
  20. because of the juxtaposition of the words. This is shown by a more recent decision of this Court in United States v. Wong
    Search
  21. was held to be. In Fyke v. United
    Search
  22. The Circuit Court of Appeals of the Ninth Circuit, in Coleman v. United
    Search
  23. It was held to be constitutional in United States v. Doremus
    Search
  24. in United States v. Balint
    Search
  25. Fair application of the principles of construction approved in United States v. Palmer
    Search
  26. United States v. Jin
    Search
  27. Fuey Moy, 241 U. S. 394 , and United States v. Katz
    Search
  28. the federal government may not undertake direct regulation of such matters. This Court said in United States v. Wong
    Search
  29. U.S. Supreme Court Nigro v. United
    Search
  30. and Linder v. United
    Search
  31. Bailey, Collector v. Drexel
    Search
  32. of United States v. Katz
    Search
  33. In Fyke v. United
    Search
  34. Coleman v. United
    Search
  35. and United States v. Katz
    Search
  36. Hill v. Wallace
    Search
  37. United States v. Palmer
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial