Citation network
Willing Vs. Chicago Auditorium Association
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 21, 1928
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Willing v. ChicagoSearch
-
Auditorium Association - 277 U.S. 274 (1928) U.S. Supreme Court Willing v. ChicagoSearch
-
Auditorium Association, 277 U.S. 274 (1928) Willing v. ChicagoSearch
-
Bass v. MetropolitanSearch
-
judgment. To grant that relief is beyond the power conferred upon the federal judiciary. Liberty Warehouse Co. v. GrannisSearch
-
U. S. 70 , 273 U. S. 74 . Compare Liberty Warehouse Co. v. BurelySearch
-
Tobacco Growers' Assn., 276 U. S. 71 . The statement made at the bar that Blair v. ChicagoSearch
-
supports the jurisdiction is unfounded. It is true that this is not a moot case, like Singer Manufacturing Co. v. WrightSearch
-
U. S. 696 , and United States v. AlaskaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
that, unlike Keller v. PotomacSearch
-
Electric Co., 261 U. S. 428 , 261 U. S. 444 , and Postum Cereal Co. v. CaliforniaSearch
-
that, unlike Gordon v. UnitedSearch
-
that, unlike South Spring Hill Gold Mining Co. v. AmadorSearch
-
that, unlike Fairchild v. HughesSearch
-
U. S. 126 , and Massachusetts v. MellonSearch
-
that, unlike New Jersey v. SargentSearch
-
here no attempt to secure an abstract determination by the court of the validity of a statute, as there was in Muskrat v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 219 U. S. 346 , 219 U. S. 361 , and Texas v. InterstateSearch
-
Valle, 1 Wall. 5, 68 U. S. 14 -16. Compare Jackson v. TurnleySearch
-
Rooke v. LordSearch
-
Lady Langdale v. BriggsSearch
-
of the Judicial Code, the motions to remand the cause to the state court should have been granted. Stewart v. VirginiaSearch
-
Pacific Live Stock Co. v. OregonSearch
-
as the respondent contends, it has a remedy under the law of Illinois we have no occasion to consider. Fulwiler v. McClunSearch
-
Ill. 174. Compare McCarty v. McCartySearch
-
Greenough v. GreenoughSearch
-
Devine v. LosSearch
-
not confer a remedial right to proceed in equity in a federal court in a suit of this character. Pusey & Jones Co. v. HanessenSearch
-
review such judgments of state courts when they involve a federal question. Compare Fidelity National Bank & Trust Co. v. SwopeSearch
-
Burton v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 196 U. S. 283 , 196 U. S. 295 . See Blair v. UnitedSearch
-
Flint v. StoneSearch
-
Light v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Willing v. ChicagoSearch
-
Compare Liberty Warehouse Co. v. BurelySearch
-
and United States v. AlaskaSearch
-
Keller v. PotomacSearch
-
and Postum Cereal Co. v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Gordon v. UnitedSearch
-
South Spring Hill Gold Mining Co. v. AmadorSearch
-
and Massachusetts v. MellonSearch
-
Muskrat v. UnitedSearch
-
and Texas v. InterstateSearch
-
Compare Jackson v. TurnleySearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial