Citation network
Security Mortgage Co. Vs. Powers
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 10, 1928
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 149 (1928) U.S. Supreme Court Security Mortgage Co. v. PowersSearch
-
U.S. 149 (1928) Security Mortgage Co. v. PowersSearch
-
in the Northern District of Georgia took possession of this property. It was subject to a loan deed ( see Scott v. PaisleySearch
-
act of the mortgage company could a lien be attached to the property after it had passed to the trustee ( see Murphy v. HofmanSearch
-
court must determine for itself whether a lien exists and the amount of the indebtedness secured thereby. See Hebert v. CrawfordSearch
-
Chicago Board of Trade v. JohnsonSearch
-
of the Georgia Code makes a prerequisite to the enforcement of any contract to pay attorney's fees. See Stone v. MarshallSearch
-
Turner v. PeacockSearch
-
for the contract was there made and was secured by real estate there situate. Humphrey Page 278 U. S. 154 v. TatmanSearch
-
U. S. 91 . See Benedict v. RatnerSearch
-
construction of the contract for attorney's fees presents, likewise, a question of local law. See Farmers' & M. Bank v. FedSearch
-
The obligation is held to be enforceable by action in personam in the federal courts for Georgia, Perry v. JohnSearch
-
although the debtor has become insolvent, McCall v. HerringSearch
-
or the property has passed to an administrator, Harris v. PowersSearch
-
or to a receiver, Guarantee Trust & Banking Co. v. AmericanSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
advanced by the mortgage company, and this was a present consideration. See Bank of Lumpkin v. BankSearch
-
to sue and such further time as must intervene between the commencement of the suit and the return day. Harris v. PowersSearch
-
Edenfield v. BankSearch
-
says the court in Harris v. PowersSearch
-
Royal v. Edinburgh-AmericanSearch
-
Evans v. AtlanticSearch
-
Harris v. PowersSearch
-
Mount Vernon Bank v. GibbsSearch
-
Valdosta R. Co. v. Citizens'Search
-
Equitable Life Assurance Society v. PattilloSearch
-
Guarantee Trust & Banking Co. v. AmericanSearch
-
In Equitable Life Assurance Society v. PattilloSearch
-
s failure to perform a duty to realize upon collateral held that the right to attorney's fees is denied. Compare Rylee v. BankSearch
-
British & American Mortgage Co. v. StuartSearch
-
F. 425, 430. Compare Gugel v. NewSearch
-
First Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. StuppiSearch
-
Estes v. EstesSearch
-
Compare the statement in Johnson v. GlobeSearch
-
with that in Mt. Vernon Bank v. GibbsSearch
-
Loftis v. AlexanderSearch
-
Chamlee v. AustinSearch
-
Ry. Co. v. TompkinsSearch
-
United States v. RioSearch
-
Lincoln Gas & Electric Light Co. v. LincolnSearch
-
Swift & Co. v. HockingSearch
-
Hammond v. SchappiSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Security Mortgage Co. v. PowersSearch
-
Scott v. PaisleySearch
-
Murphy v. HofmanSearch
-
See Hebert v. CrawfordSearch
-
See Stone v. MarshallSearch
-
See Benedict v. RatnerSearch
-
See Farmers' & M. Bank v. FedSearch
-
Georgia, Perry v. JohnSearch
-
McCall v. HerringSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial