Citation network
Ohio Ex Rel. Clark Vs. Deckebach
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 16, 1927
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 392 (1927) U.S. Supreme Court Ohio ex Rel. Clark v. DeckebachSearch
-
U.S. 392 (1927) Ohio ex Rel. Clark v. DeckebachSearch
-
gave judgment on the pleadings, dismissing the petition. 113 Ohio St. 347. In an earlier case, State ex Rel. Balli v. CarrelSearch
-
same time deny that plaintiff has established citizenship entitling him to the protection of the treaty. See Forsyth v. VehmeyerSearch
-
Allen v. AlleghanySearch
-
Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. Page 274 U. S. 395 v. MimsSearch
-
Lee v. CentralSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
See Bobe v. LloydsSearch
-
amusement who does not necessarily buy, sell or exchange merchandise or otherwise participate in commerce. Asakura v. SeattleSearch
-
Although the Fourteenth Amendment has been held to prohibit plainly irrational discrimination against aliens, Yick Wo v. HopkinsSearch
-
Ho Ah Kow v. NunanSearch
-
Wong Wai v. WilliamsonSearch
-
Fraser v. McConwaySearch
-
such a relation to a legitimate object of legislation as to be made the basis of a permitted classification, Patsone v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
Crane v. NewSearch
-
Page 274 U. S. 397 Frick v. WebbSearch
-
Cockrill v. CaliforniaSearch
-
U. S. 258 . Cf. McCready v. VirginiaSearch
-
harmful and vicious tendencies of public billiard and pool rooms, of which this Court took judicial notice in Murphy v. CaliforniaSearch
-
U. S. 623 . The regulation or even prohibition of the business is not forbidden. Murphy v. CaliforniaSearch
-
such knowledge of local conditions as would enable us to say that it is clearly wrong. Ft. Smith Light & Traction Co. v. BoardSearch
-
U. S. 387 . Some latitude must be allowed for the legislative appraisement of local conditions, Patsone v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
business an entire class, rather than its objectionable members selected by more empirical methods. See Westfall v. UnitedSearch
-
Rel. Clark v. DeckebachSearch
-
Rel. Balli v. CarrelSearch
-
See Forsyth v. VehmeyerSearch
-
Asakura v. SeattleSearch
-
Patsone v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
Cf. McCready v. VirginiaSearch
-
Murphy v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Ft. Smith Light & Traction Co. v. BoardSearch
-
See Westfall v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial