Citation network
Assigned Car Cases
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 31, 1927
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
decree granting the relief prayed for was entered in each case on December 15, 1925. Berwind-White Coal Mining Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Railroad Commission v. HockingSearch
-
and Traer v. ChicagoSearch
-
individual carriers, in 1907 and 1908, which was approved by this Court upon review in Interstate Commerce Commission v. IllinoisSearch
-
Interstate Commerce Commission v. IllinoisSearch
-
which, in other connections, has been approved by this Page 274 U. S. 575 Court. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. v. InterstateSearch
-
United States v. UnionSearch
-
of the private car owner. Congress could exclude private cars from interstate railroads. Compare United States v. DelawareSearch
-
U. S. 415 . And it may prescribe conditions on which alone they may be used. See Procter & Gamble Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Swift & Co. v. HockingSearch
-
Carrying coal by a railroad for its own use as fuel is likewise transportation. See Interstate Commerce Commission v. IllSearch
-
Compare Hillsdale Coal & Coke Co. v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
It is not for courts to weigh the evidence introduced before the Commission, Western Paper Makers' Chemical Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
or to inquire into the soundness of the reasoning by which its conclusions are reached, Interstate Commerce Commission v. IllinoisSearch
-
Skinner & Eddy Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
or to question the wisdom of regulations which it prescribes, United States v. NewSearch
-
Illinois Central R. Co. v. InterstateSearch
-
United States v. AbileneSearch
-
to improve the service. In essence, the power exerted is the same as that sustained in Interstate Commerce Commission v. IllinoisSearch
-
discrimination against others and may prove detrimental otherwise to the transportation service. Compare United States v. IllinoisSearch
-
Virginian Ry. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
United States et al. v. Berwind-WhiteSearch
-
Same v. BethlehemSearch
-
Same v. Rainey-WoodSearch
-
Same v. PublicSearch
-
Pocahontas Operators' Assn. et al v. BerwindWhiteSearch
-
United States et al. v. AkronSearch
-
Pocahontas Operators' Assn. et al. v. SameSearch
-
Riddle, Dean & Co. v. PittsburghSearch
-
Riddle, Dean & Co. v. NewSearch
-
Riddle, Dean & Co. v. BaltimoreSearch
-
Assn. v. DenverSearch
-
Consol. Fuel Co. v. A.TSearch
-
Huerfano Coal Co. v. ColoSearch
-
Vulcan Co. v. IllSearch
-
Gallatin Coal Co. v. L &Search
-
Avella Coal Co. v. PittsburghSearch
-
Griffith v. JenningsSearch
-
Dering Mines Co v. DirectorSearch
-
Northern W.Va. Assn. v. PittsburghSearch
-
Wayne Coal Co. v. DirectorSearch
-
See Royal Coal & Coke Co. v. SouthernSearch
-
railroad fuel loading in accordance with the decisions of the Interstate Commerce Commission in R. Com. of Ohio et al. v. H.VSearch
-
and Traer v. ChicagoSearch
-
Compare Peoria & Pekin Union Ry. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. NewSearch
-
United States v. KoenigSearch
-
Berwind-White Coal Mining Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Railroad Commission v. HockingSearch
-
and Traer v. ChicagoSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial