Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Clark Vs. Poor

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 31, 1927

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

28 entries 2 linked 26 unlinked
Show
  1. Hess Vs. Pawloski US Supreme Court · May 16, 1927
  2. Buck Vs. Kuykendall US Supreme Court · Mar 02, 1925
  3. U.S. 554 (1927) U.S. Supreme Court Clark v. Poor
    Search
  4. U.S. 554 (1927) Clark v. Poor
    Search
  5. the Commission had recognized, before this suit was begun, that, under Buck v. Kuykendall
    Search
  6. U. S. 307 , and Bush v. Maloy
    Search
  7. a certificate upon application and compliance with other provisions of the law. See Cannon Ball Transportation Co. v. Public
    Search
  8. This Court has jurisdiction, as an interlocutory injunction had been applied for and a restraining order issued. Moore v. Fidelity
    Search
  9. Smith v. Wilson
    Search
  10. are subject to regulation by the state to ensure safety and convenience and the conservation of the highways. Morris v. Duby
    Search
  11. for hire, who make the highways their place of business, may properly be charged an extra tax for such use. Hendrick v. Maryland
    Search
  12. Kane v. New
    Search
  13. Jersey, 242 U. S. 160 . Compare Packard v. Banton
    Search
  14. The lower court held that, under Michigan Public Utilities Commission v. Duke
    Search
  15. U. S. 570 , this provision could not be applied to exclusively interstate carriers, Red Ball Transit Co. v. Marshall
    Search
  16. and since an injunction was the only relief sought, it properly dismissed the bill. Compare Chicago G. W. Ry. Co. v. Kendall
    Search
  17. insurance on the interstate cargo, may be required of a carrier engaged wholly in interstate commerce. Compare Hess v. Pawloski
    Search
  18. U.S. Supreme Court Clark v. Poor
    Search
  19. and Bush v. Maloy
    Search
  20. See Cannon Ball Transportation Co. v. Public
    Search
  21. Moore v. Fidelity
    Search
  22. Hendrick v. Maryland
    Search
  23. Compare Packard v. Banton
    Search
  24. Michigan Public Utilities Commission v. Duke
    Search
  25. Red Ball Transit Co. v. Marshall
    Search
  26. Compare Chicago G. W. Ry. Co. v. Kendall
    Search
  27. Compare Hess v. Pawloski
    Search
  28. Morris v. Duby
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial