Citation network
Reading Co. Vs. Koons
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 12, 1926
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 58 (1926) U.S. Supreme Court Reading Co. v. KoonsSearch
-
U.S. 58 (1926) Reading Co. v. KoonsSearch
-
administrator, who is the only person authorized by the statute to maintain the action. American R. Co. of Porto Rico v. BirchSearch
-
St. Louis, S.F. & T. Ry. v. SealeSearch
-
U. S. 156 . The question had never been directly answered by this Court, although, in Missouri, K. & T. Ry. v. WulfSearch
-
in the decisions of other courts. The decision of the First Circuit Court of Appeals in American R. Co. of Porto Rico v. CoronasSearch
-
that the statute does not begin to run until the appointment of the administrator, has been followed in Guinther v. PhiladelphiaSearch
-
R. Ry., 1 F.2d 85, in Kierejewski v. GreatSearch
-
cases have laid down a similar rule with respect to state laws giving a right of recovery for wrongful death. Andrews v. HartfordSearch
-
Crapo v. CitySearch
-
of Syracuse, 183 N.Y. 395. On the other hand, the Supreme Court of Georgia ( Seaboard Air Line v. BrooksSearch
-
Ga. 625) and the Supreme Court of Kansas ( Giersch v. AtchisonSearch
-
Pac. 591) have expressly declined to follow the rule laid down in the First Circuit in American R. Co. of Porto Rico v. CoronasSearch
-
supra. The same result was reached in Bixler v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
R. Co., 201 F. 553, and a like rule has been applied in state courts to similar state statutes. See Radezky v. SargentSearch
-
of the statutory period, the suit may be maintained and a recovery had under the statute. See Missouri, K. & T. Ry. v. WulfSearch
-
supra. See also Seaboard Air Line v. RennSearch
-
U. S. 290 , and New York C. & H.R. Co.R. Co. v. KinneySearch
-
without regard to any intervening period after death when there is no executor or administrator. Compare Whipple v. JohnsonSearch
-
Gibson v. RuffSearch
-
Sammis v. WightmanSearch
-
See Johnson, Adm'r v. WrenSearch
-
Bucklin v. FordSearch
-
Dunning v. OceanSearch
-
Seymour v. MechanicsSearch
-
Murray v. EastSearch
-
Tynan v. WalkerSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Reading Co. v. KoonsSearch
-
American R. Co. of Porto Rico v. BirchSearch
-
Missouri, K. & T. Ry. v. WulfSearch
-
American R. Co. of Porto Rico v. CoronasSearch
-
Guinther v. PhiladelphiaSearch
-
Kierejewski v. GreatSearch
-
Andrews v. HartfordSearch
-
Seaboard Air Line v. BrooksSearch
-
Giersch v. AtchisonSearch
-
Bixler v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
See Radezky v. SargentSearch
-
See Missouri, K. & T. Ry. v. WulfSearch
-
Seaboard Air Line v. RennSearch
-
and New York C. & H.R. Co.R. Co. v. KinneySearch
-
Compare Whipple v. JohnsonSearch
-
Tynan v. WalkerSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial