Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Roberts and Schaefer Co. Vs. Emmerson

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 12, 1926

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

28 entries 4 linked 24 unlinked
Show
  1. Underwood Typewriter Co. Vs. Chamberlain US Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1920
  2. Pacific Express Co. Vs. Seibert US Supreme Court · Jan 04, 1892
  3. American Sugar Refining Co. Vs. Louisiana US Supreme Court · Nov 06, 1900
  4. Clement National Bank Vs. Vermont US Supreme Court · Nov 10, 1913
  5. Roberts & Schaefer Co. v. Emmerson
    Search
  6. U.S. 50 (1926) U.S. Supreme Court Roberts & Schaefer Co. v. Emmerson
    Search
  7. U.S. 50 (1926) Roberts & Schaefer Company v. Emmerson
    Search
  8. Air-Way Corp. v. Day
    Search
  9. the Secretary of State to accept the lesser sum in satisfaction of the tax. People ex rel. Roberts & Schaefer Co. v. Emmerson
    Search
  10. capital stock is not a permissible basis for a franchise tax, the plaintiff relies on Air-Way Electric Appliance Corp. v. Day
    Search
  11. not impose a franchise tax on a domestic corporation, measured by its authorized capital stock. See Kansas City Ry. v. Kansas
    Search
  12. Kansas City v. Stiles
    Search
  13. show that he is himself affected unfavorably by the discrimination of which he complains. See Western Union Tel. Co. v. Massachusetts
    Search
  14. Gast Realty Co. v. Schneider
    Search
  15. Withnell v. Ruecking
    Search
  16. is enough that the classification is reasonably founded upon or related to some permissible policy of taxation. Watson v. State
    Search
  17. as amended, was decided in Roberts & Schaefer Co. v. Emmerson
    Search
  18. can give rise to no inference that the state contracted not to increase or otherwise modify the tax. See Home Ins. Co. v. City
    Search
  19. Memphis Gas Co. v. Shelby
    Search
  20. Wisconsin & Michigan R. Co. v. Powers
    Search
  21. Seton Hall College v. South
    Search
  22. U.S. Supreme Court Roberts & Schaefer Co. v. Emmerson
    Search
  23. Roberts & Schaefer Company v. Emmerson
    Search
  24. Air-Way Electric Appliance Corp. v. Day
    Search
  25. See Kansas City Ry. v. Kansas
    Search
  26. See Western Union Tel. Co. v. Massachusetts
    Search
  27. Watson v. State
    Search
  28. See Home Ins. Co. v. City
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales