Citation network
Tutun Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 12, 1926
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Tutun v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 270 U.S. 568 (1926) U.S. Supreme Court Tutun v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 270 U.S. 568 (1926) Tutun v. UnitedSearch
-
in the United States. The existence of the jurisdiction was assumed by this Court, without discussion, in Ozawa v. UnitedSearch
-
In the Fifth Circuit, Page 270 U. S. 575 jurisdiction was denied in United States v. DollaSearch
-
F. 101. Although the correctness of the decision was questioned by Judge Amidon in United States v. LeonoreSearch
-
F. 865, 869, and by Judge Hough in United States v. MulveySearch
-
of the Naturalization Act. United States v. NessSearch
-
petition may not preclude another application for naturalization. In re Pollock, 257 F. 350. Compare Salinger v. LoiselSearch
-
Muskrat v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
United States may create rights in individuals against itself and provide only an administrative remedy. United States v. BabcockSearch
-
available Page 270 U. S. 577 only after all administrative remedies have been exhausted. Compare New Orleans v. PaineSearch
-
United States v. SingSearch
-
Chorpenning v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 94 U. S. 397 , 94 U. S. 399 . Or it may provide only a remedy. Compare Turner v. UnitedSearch
-
to it. See In re Mudarri, 176 F. 465. Its contentions are submitted to the court for adjudication. See Smith v. AdamsSearch
-
judgments of a court of record, is accepted as complete evidence of its own validity unless set aside. Campbell v. GordonSearch
-
Pet. 393, 29 U. S. 408 . It may not be collaterally attacked. Pintsch Compressing Co. Page 270 U. S. 578 v. BerginSearch
-
as stated in Johannessen v. UnitedSearch
-
tribunal pass upon them, and, if the requisite facts are established, to receive the certificate. See United States v. ShanahanSearch
-
Luria v. UnitedSearch
-
phrase may, of course, have different meanings when used in different Page 270 U. S. 579 connections. Lamar v. UnitedSearch
-
litigant be afforded the opportunity of having every judicial decision reviewed by an appellate court. Compare Rogers v. PeckSearch
-
except those for which it provided a direct review by this Court. See Lau Ow Bew v. UnitedSearch
-
denial of a review in naturalization cases would ingraft an exception upon an otherwise universal rule. Compare Craig v. HechtSearch
-
That end is subserved by the correction of errors of the trial court through appellate review. Neither United States v. NessSearch
-
Harmon v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. GeorgeSearch
-
United States v. PoslusnySearch
-
United States v. CohenSearch
-
United States v. BaisaraSearch
-
United States v. FokschauerSearch
-
Yunghauss v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. MeyerSearch
-
United States v. VogelSearch
-
United States v. MartoranaSearch
-
Bessho v. UnitedSearch
-
Dow v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. DoyleSearch
-
United States v. BrelinSearch
-
United States v. OjalaSearch
-
United States v. PetersonSearch
-
United States v. RodiekSearch
-
United States v. DalySearch
-
United States v. NeugebauerSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial