Citation network
Taylor Vs. Voss
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 03, 1926
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 176 (1926) U.S. Supreme Court Taylor v. VossSearch
-
U.S. 176 (1926) Taylor v. VossSearch
-
and no interest had passed to the testamentary trustee, and accordingly reversed the order of the district court. Voss v. TaylorSearch
-
issues between the trustee and adverse claimants concerning the right and title to the bankrupt's estate. Hewit v. BerlinSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Tefft & Co. v. MunsuriSearch
-
Swift & Co. v. HooverSearch
-
by appeals which bring up the whole matter and open both the facts and the law for consideration. Duryea Power Co. v. SternberghSearch
-
of bankruptcy proceed in a summary way in the final settlement and distribution of the estate, U.S. Fidelity Co. v. BraySearch
-
orders and decrees may be reviewed by petitions for revision which bring up questions of law only. Duryea Power Co. v. SternberghSearch
-
an appeal for the purpose of enlarging the scope of the review so as to extend to questions of fact, Duryea Power Co. v. SternberghSearch
-
presented on the record, may treat the appeal as a petition for revision, and dispose of it accordingly. Bryan v. BernheimerSearch
-
of the Bankruptcy Act. Hewit v. BerlinSearch
-
Knapp v. MilwaukeeSearch
-
Globe Bank v. MartinSearch
-
Bailey v. BakerSearch
-
Moody v. CenturySearch
-
to a familiar rule, this language should be regarded as limited by the circumstances in which it was used. Cohens v. VirginiaSearch
-
of law, the time within which he was entitled to obtain a review of the order. On the other hand, in Hewit v. BerlinSearch
-
bankruptcy has jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits of such controversy in a summary proceeding. Louisville Trust Co. v. ComingorSearch
-
Taubel Co. v. FoxSearch
-
U. S. 426 , 264 U. S. 429 . An analogous rule was also applied in Weidhorn v. LevySearch
-
of law thus presented, both as to the existence of summary jurisdiction and the merits. Chicago Board of Trade v. JohnsonSearch
-
and contingent interest, which depends upon her survivorship and is extinguished if she dies before him. Thompson v. McCorkleSearch
-
Fry v. HareSearch
-
thereupon became absolute and vested in her in the same manner as it would have done in case of his death. Roberts v. ShroyerSearch
-
Ketchum v. SchicketanzSearch
-
McCracken v. KuhnSearch
-
Haggerty v. ByrneSearch
-
Leary v. ShafferSearch
-
Straughan v. WhiteSearch
-
Mattill v. BaasSearch
-
Ragsdale v. MitchellSearch
-
Mayer v. HaggertySearch
-
Ind. 628, 634. This rule was also followed by the federal court in Indiana in Warford v. NobleSearch
-
F. 202, 203. In Roberts v. ShroyerSearch
-
Page 271 U. S. 190 In Harlin v. AmericanSearch
-
Act, the question of a wife's interest in the bankrupt's property is governed by the local law. See Stellwagen v. ClumSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Taylor v. VossSearch
-
Voss v. TaylorSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial