Citation network
Colorado Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 03, 1926
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Colorado v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 271 U.S. 153 (1926) U.S. Supreme Court Colorado v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 271 U.S. 153 (1926) Colorado v. UnitedSearch
-
A hearing before the full Commission was then sought by the state and the other protestants. Compare United States v. AbileneSearch
-
and discontinuance of operation in intrastate traffic. The remedy pursued is the appropriate one. See Texas v. EasternSearch
-
of future profit, and may therefore, without such consent, abandon all lines within the state. Brooks-Scanlon Co. v. RailroadSearch
-
Bullock v. FloridaSearch
-
Railroad Commission v. EasternSearch
-
loss, and still continue to enjoy the privilege of operating other parts within the state, Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. PublicSearch
-
Fort Smith Light & Traction Co. v. BourlandSearch
-
the obligation of providing intrastate service on every part of its line within the state. Colorado & Southern Ry. v. RailroadSearch
-
the Commission to do so without the consent of the state, the provision would be unconstitutional. Compare Texas v. EasternSearch
-
low that intrastate traffic does not bear its fair share of the cost of the service, Railroad Commission of Wisconsin v. ChicagoSearch
-
Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Ry. v. TennesseeSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
of a union station so expensive as unduly to deplete the financial resources of the carriers, Railroad Commission v. SouthernSearch
-
line, which will deplete its own financial resources or those of another interstate carrier, Texas & Pacific Ry. Co. v. GulfSearch
-
regulation of the common instrumentality, as it did in respect to safety coupling devices. Compare Southern Ry. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Atlantic Coast Line v. GeorgiaSearch
-
See Texas & Pacific Ry. Co. v. GulfSearch
-
over the issuance of securities. Compare Venner v. MichiganSearch
-
clause, as applied to surplus profits derived from intrastate operations, was sustained in Dayton-Goose Creek Ry. v. UnitedSearch
-
in both intrastate and interstate commerce to render accounts of all their business. Interstate Commerce Commission v. GoodrichSearch
-
rests likewise the power exerted by this Court in setting aside the state regulations involved in Union Pacific R. Co. v. PublicSearch
-
Service Commission, 248 U. S. 67 , and St. Louis & San Francisco Ry. Co. v. PublicSearch
-
Service Commission, 254 U. S. 535 . See also United States v. FergerSearch
-
Chicago Board of Trade v. OlsenSearch
-
by its charter, agreed in terms to continue to operate this branch regardless of loss. Compare Railroad Commission v. EasternSearch
-
explicit charter provisions must yield to the paramount power of Congress to regulate interstate commerce. New York v. UnitedSearch
-
purpose of Transportation Act 1920 to establish and maintain adequate service for both. Wisconsin Railroad Commission v. ChicagoSearch
-
Dayton-Goose Creek Ry. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. VillageSearch
-
influenced by the offer to lease the line to the protestants at a nominal rental. The case at bar is unlike Texas v. EasternSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Colorado v. UnitedSearch
-
Compare United States v. AbileneSearch
-
See Texas v. EasternSearch
-
Brooks-Scanlon Co. v. RailroadSearch
-
Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. PublicSearch
-
Colorado & Southern Ry. v. RailroadSearch
-
Compare Texas v. EasternSearch
-
Railroad Commission of Wisconsin v. ChicagoSearch
-
Railroad Commission v. SouthernSearch
-
Texas & Pacific Ry. Co. v. GulfSearch
-
Compare Southern Ry. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Compare Venner v. MichiganSearch
-
Dayton-Goose Creek Ry. v. UnitedSearch
-
Interstate Commerce Commission v. GoodrichSearch
-
Union Pacific R. Co. v. PublicSearch
-
and St. Louis & San Francisco Ry. Co. v. PublicSearch
-
Compare Railroad Commission v. EasternSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial