Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States Vs. Katz

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 24, 1926

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

32 entries 3 linked 29 unlinked
Show
  1. Viterbo Vs. Friedlander US Supreme Court · Mar 07, 1887
  2. United States Vs. Morrow US Supreme Court · Jan 05, 1925
  3. Bernier Vs. Bernier US Supreme Court · Jan 10, 1893
  4. U.S. 354 (1926) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Katz
    Search
  5. U.S. 354 (1926) United States v. Katz
    Search
  6. of the buyer and seller for a conspiracy to make the sale would have been of doubtful validity. Compare United States v. N.Y
    Search
  7. United States v. Dietrich
    Search
  8. Vannata v. United
    Search
  9. to the sale, not requiring Page 271 U. S. 356 the agreement of two persons for its completion. See Chadwick v. United
    Search
  10. be avoided whenever a reasonable application can be given to it consistent with the legislative purpose. See Hawaii v. Mankichi
    Search
  11. and cases there cited. In ascertaining that purpose, we may examine the title of the act ( United States v. Fisher
    Search
  12. Holy Trinity Church v. United
    Search
  13. U. S. 462 ), the source in previous legislation of the particular provision in question ( United Seates v. Saunders
    Search
  14. and the legislative scheme or plan by which the general purpose of the Act is to be carried out. See Platt v. Union
    Search
  15. Act was to suppress the entire traffic in intoxicating liquor as a beverage. Page 271 U. S. 358 Grogan v. Walker
    Search
  16. the legislative purpose gathered from the whole Act would be satisfied by a more limited interpretation. United States v. Jin
    Search
  17. supra. In United States v. Palmer
    Search
  18. to apply to persons, not citizens, who committed offenses on foreign vessels on the high seas. In United States v. Jin
    Search
  19. are otherwise authorized by law to traffic in intoxicating Page 271 U. S. 364 liquor. See National Lead Co. v. United
    Search
  20. U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Katz
    Search
  21. Compare United States v. N.Y
    Search
  22. See Chadwick v. United
    Search
  23. See Hawaii v. Mankichi
    Search
  24. United Seates v. Saunders
    Search
  25. See Platt v. Union
    Search
  26. Grogan v. Walker
    Search
  27. United States v. Jin
    Search
  28. In United States v. Palmer
    Search
  29. In United States v. Jin
    Search
  30. See National Lead Co. v. United
    Search
  31. United States v. Palmer
    Search
  32. United States v. Fisher
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales