Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

United States Vs. Candelaria

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 01, 1926

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

30 entries 2 linked 28 unlinked
Show
  1. Lovejoy Vs. Murray US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1865
  2. Lone Wolf Vs. Hitchcock US Supreme Court · Jan 05, 1903
  3. U.S. 432 (1926) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Candelaria
    Search
  4. U.S. 432 (1926) United States v. Candelaria
    Search
  5. of the Pueblo Indians and their lands, and the relation of the United States to both, were considered in United States v. Sandoval
    Search
  6. We are not unmindful that, in United States v. Joseph
    Search
  7. of it are significant. A decision of the territorial court in 1904 holding their lands taxable ( Territory v. Delinquent
    Search
  8. Montoya v. United
    Search
  9. as in a state of tutelage, and could alienate their lands only under governmental supervision. See Chouteau v. Molony
    Search
  10. U. S. 237 . Text writers have differed about the situation under the Mexican law, but, in United States v. Pico
    Search
  11. of designated authorities. And this was the ruling in Sunol v. Hepburn
    Search
  12. a policy which prior governments had deemed essential to the protection of such Indians. It was settled in Lane v. Pueblo
    Search
  13. doubt. The existing wardship is not an obstacle, as is shown by repeated decisions of this Court, of which Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock
    Search
  14. Bowling & Miami Investment Co. v. United
    Search
  15. S. 528 , 233 U. S. 534 . And that ruling has been recognized and given effect in other cases. Privett v. United
    Search
  16. Sunderland v. United
    Search
  17. employed and paid, we think the United States is as effectually concluded as if it were a party to the suit. Souffront v. Compagnie
    Search
  18. Claflin v. Fletcher
    Search
  19. Maloy v. Duden
    Search
  20. James v. Germania
    Search
  21. U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Candelaria
    Search
  22. United States v. Joseph
    Search
  23. Territory v. Delinquent
    Search
  24. See Chouteau v. Molony
    Search
  25. Sunol v. Hepburn
    Search
  26. Lane v. Pueblo
    Search
  27. Privett v. United
    Search
  28. Souffront v. Compagnie
    Search
  29. United States v. Sandoval
    Search
  30. United States v. Pico
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial