Citation network
Jaybird Mining Co Vs. Weir
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 07, 1926
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 609 (1926) U.S. Supreme Court Jaybird Mining Co v. WeirSearch
-
U.S. 609 (1926) Jaybird Mining Co v. WeirSearch
-
dependents in respect of their property. The restrictions imposed are in furtherance of that policy. United States v. NobleSearch
-
Goodrum v. BuffaloSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
and use of the restricted land and to mine ores therefrom for the benefit of its Indian wards. Choctaw, O. & G. R. Co. v. HarrisonSearch
-
universal and undiscriminating, the state's inability to interfere has been regarded as established since McCulloch v. MarylandSearch
-
Johnson v. MarylandSearch
-
U. S. 51 , 254 U. S. 55 . And see Farmers' Bank v. MinnesotaSearch
-
Choctaw, O. & G. R. Co. v. HarisonSearch
-
This Court has considered a number of cases quite like the one now before us. In Choctaw, O. & G. R. Co. v. HarrisonSearch
-
mining lease made in furtherance of the governmental purpose could not be subjected to that burden. In Indian Oil Co. v. OklahomaSearch
-
In Howard v. OilSearch
-
gas, less the royalty interest, under leases upon Osage lands made for the benefit of the Indians. In Large Oil Co. v. HowardSearch
-
in the production of oil and gas in what formerly constituted the tribal lands of the Osage Nation. And in Gillespie v. OklahomaSearch
-
presented a petition for a writ of certiorari, but, as a writ of error lies, the petition will be denied. Gillespie v. OklahomaSearch
-
of the United States is remote, and the tax is valid under the doctrine approved in Central Pac. R. Co. v. CaliforniaSearch
-
to extend to personalty, even though the product of the realty, so as to exempt them from taxation. Compare McCurdy v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. GraySearch
-
United States v. RansomSearch
-
Any exemption that attached to the land is limited thereto, and does not extend to the ore extracted therefrom. Forbes v. GraceySearch
-
U. S. 762 , 94 U. S. 765 -766. Compare South Utah Mines v. BeaverSearch
-
We are not dealing here with property owned by the United States, as in Van Brocklin v. TennesseeSearch
-
U. S. 151 , or Lee v. OsceolaSearch
-
all of whose property was acquired and is used solely for the purpose of serving the government, as in Clallam County v. UnitedSearch
-
And we are dealing with a property tax, as distinguished from an occupation tax. Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf Ry. Co. v. HarrisonSearch
-
Oklahoma v. TexasSearch
-
It has not done so in terms, and I see no reason for assuming that it intended to do so. Compare Mid-Northern Oil Co. v. WalkerSearch
-
Thompson v. KentuckySearch
-
Railroad Co. v. PenistonSearch
-
under a federal charter has since been followed as to other federal instrumentalities also. Western Union Tel. Co. v. MassachusettsSearch
-
Central Pacific Railroad Co. v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Gromer v. StandardSearch
-
Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf Ry. Co. v. MackeySearch
-
was in aid of the government's policy of protecting and developing the properties of its Indian wards. Thomas v. GaySearch
-
Catholic Missions v. MissoulaSearch
-
might be in the ore bins on the day as of which property is assessed. Conceivably also, the cattle owner in Thomas v. GaySearch
-
its lack of power to tax the occupation in which it is used exist in other connections. In Baltimore Shipbuilding Co. v. BaltimoreSearch
-
I suspect that my brethren would agree with me in sustaining this tax on ore in the bins but for Gillespie v. OklahomaSearch
-
Keokuk v. UlamSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial