Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Goltra Vs. Weeks

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 07, 1926

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

36 entries 8 linked 28 unlinked
Show
  1. Tindal Vs. Wesley US Supreme Court · May 10, 1897
  2. Scranton Vs. Wheeler US Supreme Court · Nov 12, 1900
  3. Davis Vs. Gray US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1872
    Relied / Followed
  4. Pennoyer Vs. Mcconnaughy US Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1891
  5. United States Vs. Gleason US Supreme Court · Jan 08, 1900
  6. Philadelphia Co. Vs. Stimson US Supreme Court · Mar 04, 1912
  7. Wells Vs. Roper US Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1918
  8. Little Vs. Barreme US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1804
  9. U.S. 536 (1926) U.S. Supreme Court Goltra v. Weeks
    Search
  10. U.S. 536 (1926) Goltra v. Weeks
    Search
  11. so taken, is not a suit against the United States, and the United States is not a necessary party. Philadelphia Co. v. Stimson
    Search
  12. U. S. 605 , followed. Wells v. Roper
    Search
  13. from their doing them in asserted agency for the government. The point is fully covered by Philadelphia Co. v. Stimson
    Search
  14. its officers from personal liability to persons whose rights of property they have wrongfully invaded. Little v. Barreme
    Search
  15. United States v. Lee
    Search
  16. Belknap v. Schild
    Search
  17. has frequently been applied with respect to state officers seeking to enforce unconstitutional enactments. Osborn v. Bank
    Search
  18. Ludwig v. Western
    Search
  19. Hopkins v. Clemson
    Search
  20. applicable to a federal officer acting in excess of his authority, or under an authority not validly conferred. Noble v. Union
    Search
  21. School of Margnetic Healing v. McAnnulty
    Search
  22. S. 546 It is sought to avoid the application of this to the present case by reference to the later case of Wells v. Roper
    Search
  23. which the determination of a vital issue under the contract is left to the decision of a government officer. Kihlberg v. United
    Search
  24. Sweeney v. United
    Search
  25. United States v. Hurley
    Search
  26. Martinsburg R. Co. v. March
    Search
  27. to justify rejection of work or product tendered. Some of them present a convincing analogy to the case. In Magee v. Scott
    Search
  28. U.S. Supreme Court Goltra v. Weeks
    Search
  29. Osborn v. Bank
    Search
  30. Noble v. Union
    Search
  31. of Wells v. Roper
    Search
  32. Kihlberg v. United
    Search
  33. In Magee v. Scott
    Search
  34. Scott v. Donald
    Search
  35. Smyth v. Ames
    Search
  36. United States v. Mason
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial