Citation network
Hudson Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Nov 22, 1926
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Hudson v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 272 U.S. 451 (1926) U.S. Supreme Court Hudson v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 272 U.S. 451 (1926) Hudson v. UnitedSearch
-
may not accept the plea and ignore the condition by imposing a prison sentence. This contention is supported by Tucker v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 196 F. 260, Shapiro v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 196 F. 268, Blum v. UnitedSearch
-
F. 269, in which sentences of imprisonment on the plea of nolo contendere were set aside. But in United States v. LairSearch
-
Cases (26th ed., 1922) 379. But no example of its use in the English courts has been found since the case of Queen v. TemplemanSearch
-
A citation Page 272 U. S. 457 to Farresly, 40, added in the later editions of Hawkins, is the case of Queen v. TemplemanSearch
-
The precise question has rarely been raised. The contention now considered was explicitly rejected in Commonwealth v. FergusonSearch
-
the courts have ordered imprisonment on pleas of nolo contendere without discussing the matter. Commonwealth v. HolstineSearch
-
Peacock v. JudgesSearch
-
Philpot v. StateSearch
-
In re Lanni, 131 A. 52, 927. State v. BurnettSearch
-
offenses punishable by fine only, without any intimations being made that its use is restricted to such cases, Young v. PeopleSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
State v. HopkinsSearch
-
Boyce 306, and accepted on charges punishable by both fine and imprisonment and a fine only imposed, Williams v. StateSearch
-
Miss. 827. In Illinois, Indiana, and Minnesota, the plea is not allowed. See People v. MillerSearch
-
Mahoney v. StateSearch
-
State v. KiewelSearch
-
thirtieth edition of 1869, edited by J. B. Maule. Chitty, relying upon Hawkins, Comyns, Burn, and the case of Queen v. TemplemanSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Hudson v. UnitedSearch
-
Tucker v. UnitedSearch
-
Shapiro v. UnitedSearch
-
Blum v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. LairSearch
-
of Queen v. TemplemanSearch
-
Commonwealth v. FergusonSearch
-
Commonwealth v. HolstineSearch
-
Peacock v. JudgesSearch
-
State v. BurnettSearch
-
Young v. PeopleSearch
-
Williams v. StateSearch
-
See People v. MillerSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial