Citation network
Lambert Vs. Yellowley
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Nov 29, 1926
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Distinguished
- Distinguished
-
U.S. 581 (1926) U.S. Supreme Court Lambert v. YellowleySearch
-
U.S. 581 (1926) Lambert v. YellowleySearch
-
reversed the decree and directed that the bill be dismissed. 4 F.2d 915. In the interval, this Court had decided Hixon v. OakesSearch
-
U. S. 254 , and Everard's Breweries v. DaySearch
-
In Everard's Breweries v. DaySearch
-
The difficulties always attendant upon the suppression of traffic in intoxicating liquors are notorious. Crane v. CampbellSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
in enforcing prohibition, is confronted with difficulties similar to those encountered by the states. Ruppert v. CaffeySearch
-
enforcing the prohibition ordained by the Eighteenth Amendment. A later case applying like principles is Selzman v. UnitedSearch
-
Besides, there is no right to practice medicine which is not subordinate to the police power of the states, Dent v. WestSearch
-
may be attended by some or all of the incidents which attend the exercise by a state of its police power. Hamilton v. KentuckySearch
-
the temptation to resort to prescriptions as pretexts for obtaining liquor for beverage uses. Compare Jacobson v. MassachusettsSearch
-
was in effect. In seven states, no intoxicating liquor of any kind could be prescribed. Ariz.Const. art. 23, Cooper v. StateSearch
-
State v. MillerSearch
-
People v. UrcavitchSearch
-
Linder v. UnitedSearch
-
implicit in the act, that vinous and spirituous liquors are of medicinal value, must be accepted here. Radice v. NewSearch
-
Rast v. VanSearch
-
U. S. 446 , 238 U. S. 452 . The majority opinion rests chiefly upon Everard's Breweries v. DaySearch
-
the Eighteenth Amendment, of prohibiting prescriptions of intoxicating malt liquors for medicinal purposes. See Radice v. NewSearch
-
the medical practice is outside the province of the federal government and wholly within that of the states ( Linder v. UnitedSearch
-
Amendment has not destroyed, of controlling medical practice and transfer it in part of Congress. See Hammer v. DagenhartSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Lambert v. YellowleySearch
-
and Everard's Breweries v. DaySearch
-
Crane v. CampbellSearch
-
Ruppert v. CaffeySearch
-
Selzman v. UnitedSearch
-
Dent v. WestSearch
-
Hamilton v. KentuckySearch
-
Compare Jacobson v. MassachusettsSearch
-
Cooper v. StateSearch
-
Radice v. NewSearch
-
See Radice v. NewSearch
-
of Congress. See Hammer v. DagenhartSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial