Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Mitchell Vs. United States

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 02, 1925

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

32 entries 2 linked 30 unlinked
Show
  1. Ettor Vs. Tacoma US Supreme Court · Apr 07, 1913
  2. New York Vs. Sage US Supreme Court · Nov 08, 1915
  3. Mitchell v. United
    Search
  4. States - 267 U.S. 341 (1925) U.S. Supreme Court Mitchell v. United
    Search
  5. States, 267 U.S. 341 (1925) Mitchell v. United
    Search
  6. Fifth Amendment, as for a taking of the business upon a promise implied in fact under the doctrine of United States v. Great
    Search
  7. upon the President's determination. Acceptance of the award did not operate, under the doctrine of United States v. Childs
    Search
  8. considered in determining the amount to be paid as the just compensation upon a taking by eminent domain. Boom Co. v. Patterson
    Search
  9. U. S. 403 , 98 U. S. 408 , New York v. Sage
    Search
  10. determination consequential damages for losses to their business, or for its destruction. Joslin Manufacturing Co. v. Providence
    Search
  11. U. S. 668 , 262 U. S. 675 . Compare Sharp v. United
    Search
  12. Campbell v. United
    Search
  13. of the taking of land. There can be no recovery under the Tucker Act if the intention to take is lacking. Tempel v. United
    Search
  14. of authority, even an intentional taking cannot support an Action for compensation under the Tucker Act. United States v. North
    Search
  15. that compensation be made for consequential damages to private property resulting from public improvements. Chicago v. Taylor
    Search
  16. Richards v. Washington
    Search
  17. Joslin Manufacturing Co. v. Providence
    Search
  18. U. S. 668 . Congress had, of course, the power to make like provision here. Compare United States v. Realty
    Search
  19. compensation for injury to property other than an interest in the land taken is the statute involved in United States v. Alexander
    Search
  20. Earle v. Commonwealth
    Search
  21. Allen v. Commonwealth
    Search
  22. U.S. Supreme Court Mitchell v. United
    Search
  23. of United States v. Great
    Search
  24. of United States v. Childs
    Search
  25. Boom Co. v. Patterson
    Search
  26. Compare Sharp v. United
    Search
  27. Tempel v. United
    Search
  28. the Tucker Act. United States v. North
    Search
  29. Chicago v. Taylor
    Search
  30. Compare United States v. Realty
    Search
  31. United States v. Alexander
    Search
  32. Earle v. Commonwealth
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial