Citation network
Buck Vs. Kuykendall
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 02, 1925
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 307 (1925) U.S. Supreme Court Buck v. KuykendallSearch
-
U.S. 307 (1925) Buck v. KuykendallSearch
-
the section as applying to common carriers engaged exclusively in interstate commerce. Northern Pacific Ry. Co. v. SchoenfeldtSearch
-
Schmidt v. DepartmentSearch
-
its laws. Having complied with the laws of Washington relating to motor vehicles, their owners and drivers ( Carlsen v. CooneySearch
-
bill. The final decree dismissing the bill was entered without further opinion. See also Interstate Motor Transit Co. v. KuykendallSearch
-
the state, in its discretion, without violating either the due process clause or the equal protection clause. Packard v. BantonSearch
-
It may make provision appropriate for securing the safety and convenience of the public in the use of them. Kane v. NewSearch
-
of supervision and maintenance and to obtaining compensation for the use of the road facilities provided. Hendrick v. MarylandSearch
-
U. S. 610 . See also Pierce Oil Corp. v. HopkinsSearch
-
commerce, in the absence of legislation by Congress which deals specifically with the subject. Vandalia R. Co. v. PublicSearch
-
the indirect burden imposed upon interstate commerce is not unreasonable. Compare Michigan Public Utilities Commission v. DukeSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
argument is unsound. It is true that one cannot in the same proceeding both assail a statute and rely upon it. Hurley v. CommissionerSearch
-
Wall v. ParrotSearch
-
who avails himself of the benefits conferred by a statute deny its validity. Page 267 U. S. 317 St. Louis Co. v. PrendergastSearch
-
to common carriers. But the permission sought was denied. The case presents no element of estoppel. Compare Arizona v. CopperSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Buck v. KuykendallSearch
-
Northern Pacific Ry. Co. v. SchoenfeldtSearch
-
Carlsen v. CooneySearch
-
Interstate Motor Transit Co. v. KuykendallSearch
-
Kane v. NewSearch
-
Hendrick v. MarylandSearch
-
Vandalia R. Co. v. PublicSearch
-
Compare Michigan Public Utilities Commission v. DukeSearch
-
Hurley v. CommissionerSearch
-
Wall v. ParrotSearch
-
St. Louis Co. v. PrendergastSearch
-
Compare Arizona v. CopperSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial