Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

May Vs. Henderson

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 13, 1925

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

62 entries 9 linked 53 unlinked
Show
  1. Galbraith Vs. Vallely US Supreme Court · Apr 11, 1921
  2. Mueller Vs. Nugent US Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1902
  3. Babbitt Vs. Dutcher US Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1910
  4. Schweer Vs. Brown US Supreme Court · Nov 07, 1904
  5. Hebert Vs. Crawford US Supreme Court · Apr 07, 1913
  6. Phoenix Bank Vs. Risley US Supreme Court · Mar 24, 1844
  7. Louisville Trust Co. Vs. Comingor US Supreme Court · Jan 27, 1902
  8. Bryan Vs. Bernheimer US Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1901
  9. Randolph Vs. Scruggs US Supreme Court · May 18, 1903
  10. U.S. 111 (1925) U.S. Supreme Court May v. Henderson
    Search
  11. U.S. 111 (1925) May v. Henderson
    Search
  12. a writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to review its action (reported as Henderson v. May
    Search
  13. a breach of trust by the other without objection, he is legally chargeable with liability for the breach. Bermingham v. Wilcox
    Search
  14. Adair v. Brimmer
    Search
  15. Hill v. Hill
    Search
  16. can only be recovered in a plenary suit, and not by a summary proceeding in a bankruptcy court. Louisville Trust Co. v. Comingor
    Search
  17. First National Bank of Chicago v. Chicago
    Search
  18. which may direct an accounting and a payment over to the trustee or receiver appointed by the bankruptcy court. White v. Schloerb
    Search
  19. Chicago Board of Trade v. Johnson
    Search
  20. In re Diamond's Estate, 259 F. 70, 74. And see Bryan v. Bernheimer
    Search
  21. U. S. 188 . See Louisville Trust Co. v. Comingor
    Search
  22. and Galbraith v. Vallely
    Search
  23. was defeated by the adverse claim of the assignee arising before the filing of the petition. And see Randolph v. Scruggs
    Search
  24. nature of the title of the assignee for the benefit of creditors when bankruptcy ensues. See also Taubel, etc., Co. v. Fox
    Search
  25. ascertaining whether the summary remedy is an appropriate one within the principles of decision here stated. Mueller v. Nugent
    Search
  26. of the bankrupt and his creditors. They were creditors of the bank and the bank was their debtor. Marine Bank v. Fulton
    Search
  27. Lazarus v. Prentice
    Search
  28. Knapp & Spencer Co. v. Drew
    Search
  29. Gunther v. Home
    Search
  30. Reed v. Barnett
    Search
  31. Nat. Bank, 250 F. 983, and see Acme Harvester Co. v. Beekman
    Search
  32. Lum. Co., 222 U. S. 301 . See Babbitt v. Dutcher
    Search
  33. White v. Schloerb
    Search
  34. A summary order may be made directing repayment of the money to the trustee in bankruptcy. Knapp & Spencer Co. v. Drew
    Search
  35. Nat. Bank, supra. See Farmers' & Mechanics' Bank v. Wilkinson
    Search
  36. who, pending the bankruptcy proceedings, willfully dispose of it by placing it beyond the reach of the court. Bryan v. Bernheimer
    Search
  37. the filing of the petition, in the face of its extension of its note by the creditors' agreement ( Fifth National Bank v. Lyttle
    Search
  38. Heyman v. Third
    Search
  39. of its transfer of the account to trustees for the benefit of creditors under the agreement signed by it. Fitzgerald v. Bank
    Search
  40. Lynman v. Bank
    Search
  41. petition in bankruptcy, is an adverse claim which cannot be adjudicated in a summary proceeding ( Louisville Trust Co. v. Comingor
    Search
  42. Galbraith v. Valley
    Search
  43. he has put it out of his power to deliver it, he may nevertheless be compelled to account for its worth. United States v. Dunn
    Search
  44. by summary order to restore the value of the property thus wrongfully diverted. In re Denson, supra, and see Bryan v. Bernheimer
    Search
  45. by setting up that, although the money is still under his control, he holds it in a different capacity. See Smith v. Longbottom
    Search
  46. his trustee unless the bankrupt's ability to comply therewith is plainly and affirmatively shown. American Trust Co. v. Wallis
    Search
  47. Epstein v. Steinfeld
    Search
  48. U.S. Supreme Court May v. Henderson
    Search
  49. Henderson v. May
    Search
  50. Bermingham v. Wilcox
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial