Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Knewel Vs. Egan

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • May 25, 1925

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

31 entries 10 linked 21 unlinked
Show
  1. Bergemann Vs. Backer US Supreme Court · Apr 01, 1895
  2. Felts Vs. Murphy US Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1906
  3. Valentina Vs. Mercer US Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1906
  4. Frank Vs. Mangum US Supreme Court · Apr 12, 1915
  5. Howard Vs. Fleming US Supreme Court · Nov 16, 1903
  6. Dimmick Vs. Tompkins US Supreme Court · May 31, 1904
  7. Andrews Vs. Swartz US Supreme Court · Feb 04, 1895
  8. United States Vs. Pridgeon US Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1894
  9. Markuson Vs. Boucher US Supreme Court · Nov 20, 1899
  10. Riddle Vs. Dyche US Supreme Court · May 21, 1923
  11. U.S. 442 (1925) U.S. Supreme Court Knewel v. Egan
    Search
  12. U.S. 442 (1925) Knewel v. Egan
    Search
  13. On appeal to the supreme court of the state, judgment of conviction was vacated and new trial granted. State v. Egan
    Search
  14. the state penitentiary. Upon appeal to the supreme court of the state, the judgment of conviction was affirmed. State v. Egan
    Search
  15. made later, to withdraw the plea and demur was denied, the court acting within its discretionary power. State v. Egan
    Search
  16. State v. Egan
    Search
  17. Court that habeas corpus calls in question only the jurisdiction of the court whose judgment is challenged. Andrews v. Swartz
    Search
  18. Goto v. Lane
    Search
  19. error, it is not so fatal, upon its face, as to be open to collateral attack after trial and conviction. United States v. Pridgeon
    Search
  20. U. S. 48 , 153 U. S. 59 , and see State v. Egan
    Search
  21. United States is alleged to have been denied to the person convicted. The proper remedy is by writ of error. Markuson v. Boucher
    Search
  22. U. S. 184 . And see Baker v. Grice
    Search
  23. U. S. 284 , and Tinsley v. Anderson
    Search
  24. See also, with respect to review, on habeas corpus, of judgments of United States district courts, Riddle v. Dyche
    Search
  25. U. S. 333 , and Craig v. Hecht
    Search
  26. officer representing the county and the state. The substitution of the sheriff as appellant should be made ( Thompson v. United
    Search
  27. U.S. Supreme Court Knewel v. Egan
    Search
  28. Baker v. Grice
    Search
  29. and Tinsley v. Anderson
    Search
  30. and Craig v. Hecht
    Search
  31. Thompson v. United
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial