Citation network
Georgia Vs. Chattanooga
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 07, 1924
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 472 (1924) U.S. Supreme Court Georgia v. ChattanoogaSearch
-
U.S. 472 (1924) Georgia v. ChattanoogaSearch
-
The power of eminent domain is an attribute of sovereignty, and inheres in every independent state. See Boom Co. v. PattersonSearch
-
United States v. JonesSearch
-
Shoemaker v. UnitedSearch
-
Cincinnati v. LouisvilleSearch
-
It cannot be surrendered, and, if attempted to be contracted away, it may be resumed at will. Pennsylvania Hospital v. PhiladelphiaSearch
-
U. S. 473 . It is superior to property rights ( Kohl v. UnitedSearch
-
of the state -- to lands already devoted to railway use, as well as to other lands within the state. United States v. GettysburgSearch
-
Adirondack Railway v. NewSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
state does not restrict or modify the power of eminent domain of the state wherein the land is situated. See Burbank v. FaySearch
-
United States v. RailroadSearch
-
a railroad, and, as to that property, it cannot claim sovereign privilege or immunity. Bank of the United States v. Planters'Search
-
Louisville Railroad Co. v. LetsonSearch
-
South Carolina v. UnitedSearch
-
East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia Railway Co. v. NashvilleSearch
-
and having taken on the character of those engaged in the railroad business in Tennessee ( Bank of the United States v. Planters'Search
-
is a legislative, and not a judicial, function, and an opportunity to be heard in advance need not be given. Bragg v. WeaverSearch
-
publication of notice is sufficient. Bragg v. WeaverSearch
-
whether the taking is for a public purpose ( Rindge Co. v. LosSearch
-
Hairston v. DanvilleSearch
-
U. S. 598 , 208 U. S. 606 ), and the amount of the compensation ( Seaboard Air Line Railway v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 304 ). Georgia has been given notice, and has the right voluntarily to appear. See Clark v. BarnardSearch
-
decide that question. The decision of its highest court on that question would be followed by this Court. Maguire v. ReardonSearch
-
Cusack Co. v. ChicagoSearch
-
Reinman v. PageSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Georgia v. ChattanoogaSearch
-
See Boom Co. v. PattersonSearch
-
Pennsylvania Hospital v. PhiladelphiaSearch
-
Kohl v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. GettysburgSearch
-
See Burbank v. FaySearch
-
Bank of the United States v. Planters'Search
-
Rindge Co. v. LosSearch
-
Seaboard Air Line Railway v. UnitedSearch
-
See Clark v. BarnardSearch
-
Court. Maguire v. ReardonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial